2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and responsiveness of the Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition in children with intellectual disability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
62
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…173,385 Two studies that had used a ROC curve to determine the anchor method estimate discussed the considerations for when sensitivity or specificity or both should be prioritised. 386,387 A study by Bagó and colleagues 388 also considered the purpose of the research, noting that, for patient-reported outcomes, the anchor method may be preferred as it incorporates patients' views. Of studies that used a SES method alongside distribution methods to calculate a target difference, 389-392 a measurement error distribution method was used along with an effect size of 0.2 SDs, 0.5 SDs and/or 1.0 SD and then the sample difference was used to convert to a change.…”
Section: Combining Results Derived From Multiple Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…173,385 Two studies that had used a ROC curve to determine the anchor method estimate discussed the considerations for when sensitivity or specificity or both should be prioritised. 386,387 A study by Bagó and colleagues 388 also considered the purpose of the research, noting that, for patient-reported outcomes, the anchor method may be preferred as it incorporates patients' views. Of studies that used a SES method alongside distribution methods to calculate a target difference, 389-392 a measurement error distribution method was used along with an effect size of 0.2 SDs, 0.5 SDs and/or 1.0 SD and then the sample difference was used to convert to a change.…”
Section: Combining Results Derived From Multiple Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the target sample size of the BOT-2 normative sample included 110 cases for those aged 8, 9, and 11 years old and 120 cases for those aged 10 years old, respectively; both sexes were equally represented (approximately 50/50^2) across all age groups. The BOT-2 was selected for use in the present study because it assesses different aspects of motor proficiency; it includes a normative sample, has been used in special population children (see Wuang & Su, 2009), and demonstrates good test -retest reliability for use in individuals with PWS (White et al, 2012).…”
Section: Bot-2: a Measure Of Motor Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 Subtests of balance, upper limb coordination, and running speed and agility were assessed as these have been shown to yield the largest effect sizes from age-matched normative data in a previous study of children with NF1. 6 Subdomain raw scores were converted to scaled scores using normative age-and sex-specific data from the BOT-2 manual.…”
Section: Procedures and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%