2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and relationships among handgrip strength, leg extensor strength and power, and balance in older men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
46
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Further statistical analysis have shown extremely high level of reliability of the given contractile characteristic RFDmax of hand grip in all of the tested age groups on ICC level from 0.903 to 0.971 for non-dominant hand, and from 0.948 to 0.964 for dominant hand ( Table 3). As in the case of F max these results are in con rmation with the early established standards in relation to the reliability of methods for testing the explosive hand grip force where the ICC levels from 0.870 to 0.930 (Demura et al, 2003;Jenkins et al, 2014) i.e. in accordance with the high reliability of the standard tests of force of the other muscular groups leveled from 0.808 to 0.945 Cronbach's Alpha for the standard leg thrist (Ivanovic and Dopsaj, 2013).…”
Section: Chartsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further statistical analysis have shown extremely high level of reliability of the given contractile characteristic RFDmax of hand grip in all of the tested age groups on ICC level from 0.903 to 0.971 for non-dominant hand, and from 0.948 to 0.964 for dominant hand ( Table 3). As in the case of F max these results are in con rmation with the early established standards in relation to the reliability of methods for testing the explosive hand grip force where the ICC levels from 0.870 to 0.930 (Demura et al, 2003;Jenkins et al, 2014) i.e. in accordance with the high reliability of the standard tests of force of the other muscular groups leveled from 0.808 to 0.945 Cronbach's Alpha for the standard leg thrist (Ivanovic and Dopsaj, 2013).…”
Section: Chartsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Даље статистичке анализе су показале изузетно висок ниво поу-зданости испољавања дате контрактилне карак-теристике RFD max стиска шаке код свих тестира-них узрасних група и то на нивоу ICC од 0.903 до 0.971 за недоминантну руку, односно од 0.948 до 0.964 ICC за доминантну руку (Табела 3). Као и у случају F max и ови резултати су у сагласности са претходно утврђеним стандардима у односу на поузданост методе за тестирање испољавања ек-сплозивне јачине стиска шаке где је ICC на нивоу 0.870-0.930 (Demura et al, 2003;Jenkins et al, 2014), односно у складу са високом поузданошћу стан-дардних тестова јачине и код осталих мишићних група на нивоу од 0.808-0.945 Cronbach's Alpha за стандардни потисак ногама (Ivanovic and Dopsaj, 2013). На основу досадашњих истраживања, али и добијених резултата овог истраживања, показа-ло се да је примена изометријског тестирања, а у односу на мерење максималне експлозивне јачи-не код теста "стиска шаке" поуздан и у функцији различитог узраста испитаника код мушкараца.…”
Section: дискусијаunclassified
“…Participants involved in our study showed different activity level varying from sedentary to a regular active lifestyle, representing a heterogeneous group and with a wide range of strength values. Moreover, the sample size was larger than previous studies analyzing reliability of isometric and isokinetic leg extension 26 and flexion 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although research has demonstrated lower levels of CRP among individuals with greater muscular strength [10], no study to our knowledge has investigated the relationship between muscular strength and CRP across different body mass index (BMI) levels. Furthermore, the majority of studies have used grip strength when examining the relationship between muscular strength and health outcomes; however, there has been conflicting evidence regarding the functional importance of this measurement [18]. Specifically, it has been suggested that grip strength may not serve as a surrogate for balance or dynamic assessment of lower body strength [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the majority of studies have used grip strength when examining the relationship between muscular strength and health outcomes; however, there has been conflicting evidence regarding the functional importance of this measurement [18]. Specifically, it has been suggested that grip strength may not serve as a surrogate for balance or dynamic assessment of lower body strength [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%