2009
DOI: 10.1097/htr.0b013e3181a66356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method With Prisoners

Abstract: These results provide further support for the reliability and validity of summary indices of lifetime exposure to TBI when elicited via a structured interview.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
160
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
160
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of 21% found in this study confirms previous findings published in Canada and the United States (Bogner & Corrigan, 2009; Brewer‐Smyth et al., 2004; Colantonio et al., 2007, 2014; Diamond et al., 2007; Ferguson et al., 2012; Gunter et al., 2009; Hawley & Maden, 2003; Hux et al., 1998; Lewis et al., 1986; Perron & Howard, 2008; Sarapata et al., 1998; Slaughter et al., 2003). As data about the prevalence of TBI are lacking for Europe, it is hazardous to compare our findings with the prevalence of a history of TBI in the general population in France (Tagliaferri, Compagnone, Korsic, Servadei, & Kraus, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prevalence of 21% found in this study confirms previous findings published in Canada and the United States (Bogner & Corrigan, 2009; Brewer‐Smyth et al., 2004; Colantonio et al., 2007, 2014; Diamond et al., 2007; Ferguson et al., 2012; Gunter et al., 2009; Hawley & Maden, 2003; Hux et al., 1998; Lewis et al., 1986; Perron & Howard, 2008; Sarapata et al., 1998; Slaughter et al., 2003). As data about the prevalence of TBI are lacking for Europe, it is hazardous to compare our findings with the prevalence of a history of TBI in the general population in France (Tagliaferri, Compagnone, Korsic, Servadei, & Kraus, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Among studies looking at the prevalence of TBI among females offenders (Bogner & Corrigan, 2009; Brewer‐Smyth et al., 2004; Colantonio et al., 2007, 2014; Diamond, Harzke, Magaletta, Cummins, & Frankowski, 2007; Ferguson et al., 2012; Gunter et al., 2009; Hawley & Maden, 2003; Hux et al., 1998; Lewis, Pincus, Feldman, Jackson, & Bard, 1986; Perron & Howard, 2008; Sarapata, Herrmann, Johnson, & Aycock, 1998; Slaughter, Fann, & Ehde, 2003), the rates vary from 9.5% (Perron & Howard, 2008) to 100% (Lewis et al., 1986). A rate of 100% was found in a very small sample of two women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, initial injury severity was retrospectively estimated utilizing the Ohio State University TBI identification (OSU TBI‐ID) method (Corrigan & Bogner, 2007). The OSU TBI‐ID method has good interrater reliability and test–retest reliability (Bogner & Corrigan, 2009; Corrigan & Bogner, 2007). Furthermore, the OSU TBI‐ID method estimates initial injury severity based on participants’ recollections of the incidents including the estimated duration of loss of consciousness (LOC), and the CDC guidelines for the conceptual definition and identification of TBI (National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2003; Thurman, Sniezek, Johnson, Greenspan, & Smith, 1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, prior research has shown acceptable to high levels of reliability including both inter-rater and test/retest reliability (Bogner & Corrigan, 2009;Corrigan & Bogner, 2007a, 2007bFerguson, et al, 2012). Similar levels of predictive validity have been demonstrated by examining the relationship between lifetime history of TBI and effects that are commonly associated with TBI including cognitive performance, interpersonal functioning, and violence and aggression (Bogner & Corrigan, 2009;Corrigan & Bogner, 2007a, 2007bCorrigan, et al, 2012;Ferguson, et al, 2012). Additionally, the OSU-TBI-ID is becoming a widely recognized valid instrument as evidenced by its adoption in a variety of research and clinical practices including, for example, the "TBI Model Systems National Database Syllabus" (TBIMS, 2016) and the National Institute of Health's "National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification (OSU-TBI-ID) instrument was designed for clinical purposes to capture the prevalence and severity of TBI and has been utilized in numerous studies and across a variety of populations including military personnel, veterans, and prisoners (Bogner & Corrigan, 2009;Corrigan & Bogner, 2007a, 2007bCorrigan, Bogner, & Holloman, 2012;Ferguson, et al, 2012). However, while extant research suggests that the OSU-TBI-ID accurately captures the presence of TBI, it has not been used to determine whether having TBI is associated with subsequent involvement in the criminal justice system.…”
Section: Traumatic Brain Injury and Recidivism Among Returning Inmatesmentioning
confidence: 99%