2012
DOI: 10.4230/oasics.atmos.2012.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability and Delay Distributions of Train Connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Büker and Seybold (2012) propose a probability distribution convolution model for large railway networks, assuming exponentially distributed process times. Keyhani et al (2012) and Lemnian et al (2014) present stochastic graph approaches to predict the expected reliability of a scheduled train connection. Kecman and Goverde (2015b) use a microscopic TEG model to predict train events with dynamic edge weights.…”
Section: General Graph Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Büker and Seybold (2012) propose a probability distribution convolution model for large railway networks, assuming exponentially distributed process times. Keyhani et al (2012) and Lemnian et al (2014) present stochastic graph approaches to predict the expected reliability of a scheduled train connection. Kecman and Goverde (2015b) use a microscopic TEG model to predict train events with dynamic edge weights.…”
Section: General Graph Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction horizon lasts from a few minutes up to a few hours. Predictions lead to a psychologic reduction of discomfort due to known delay against unknown delay; in case of connections, the predicted probability of catching the connecting train creates awareness (see Keyhani et al (2012). Effects can be changes in route choice resulting in a potential replanning of transport chains (e.g., transfers, different trains).…”
Section: Customer-passengersmentioning
confidence: 99%