2016
DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2016.1164634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reliability Analysis of P+ Pickup on Anti-ESD Performance in Four CMOS Low-Voltage Technology Nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, with the increase of the number of TLP actions, the promotion of avalanche breakdown became more obvious, and eventually led to the destructive failure of the device. According to engineering experience, for ESDsensitive NMOS devices subjected to damage, if the threshold voltage exceeds 20% of the original value, the device can be judged to have destructive failure [4]. Combining the Table 1, it can be seen that the device has failed after three TLP actions.…”
Section: 1esd Destructive Failure Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, with the increase of the number of TLP actions, the promotion of avalanche breakdown became more obvious, and eventually led to the destructive failure of the device. According to engineering experience, for ESDsensitive NMOS devices subjected to damage, if the threshold voltage exceeds 20% of the original value, the device can be judged to have destructive failure [4]. Combining the Table 1, it can be seen that the device has failed after three TLP actions.…”
Section: 1esd Destructive Failure Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notermans Guido et al [3] applied ESD to GGNMOSFET devices and from the analysis of the output current waveform they concluded that the TLP current parameters could be adjusted to achieve the effect of simulating the HBM and MM models. TLP is becoming one of the most effective test methods for ESD protection structure testing [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, LDMOS devices may act as HV devices and ESD protection device simultaneously. To reduce the effects of ESD, improving the self-protection performance of HV devices is significant [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Therefore, to achieve good ESD capability in devices, parameters including trigger voltage (V t1 ), holding voltage (V h ), and secondary breakdown current (I t2 ) are critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, the ESD immunity of this protection device becomes not proportional to the device size. As shown the voltage-current characteristic curve of a protection device in Figure3, the difference between the secondary breakdown voltage (V t2 ) and V t1 values affects the turned-on probability and non-uniform turned-on issues on each MOSFET[24]. In order to enhance uniform conduction, it is generally desirable to adjust the snapback curve as shown by the dashed curve in Figure3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%