2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance and prosody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
139
1
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
139
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, procedural meaning is not immediately available to introspection (Blakemore 2011;Wilson 2011), and the best procedural analyses will be those that unify an apparently diverse array of surface effects. In recent years, the notion of procedural meaning has been quite widely used in analysing referring expressions in relevance theory, so that the pronoun she, for instance, is seen as encoding a procedure which narrows the search space for reference resolution to the set of female (or grammatically feminine) candidate referents (Hedley, 2007;Powell, 2010;Wilson and Sperber, 1993;Wilson and Wharton, 2006).…”
Section: Procedural Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, procedural meaning is not immediately available to introspection (Blakemore 2011;Wilson 2011), and the best procedural analyses will be those that unify an apparently diverse array of surface effects. In recent years, the notion of procedural meaning has been quite widely used in analysing referring expressions in relevance theory, so that the pronoun she, for instance, is seen as encoding a procedure which narrows the search space for reference resolution to the set of female (or grammatically feminine) candidate referents (Hedley, 2007;Powell, 2010;Wilson and Sperber, 1993;Wilson and Wharton, 2006).…”
Section: Procedural Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is construed in the current paper, procedural meaning is far away from that original conception. In Wharton and Wilson (2006), we put it like this (embracing a suggestion made by Dan Sperber):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yes, they involve linguistic expressions that clearly do involve non-natural meaning, but there also seem to be cases where the open showing of a spontaneously produced natural behaviour makes a difference to the speaker's meaning. To develop an example from Wilson and Wharton (2006): (26) Jack is late.…”
Section: Expressives Showing and Meaningnnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intenção ostensivamente expressa na prosódia da língua Wilson & Wharton (2006) . Segundo os pesquisadores, a prosódia propriamente linguística é parte de um sistema linguístico de signos, governado por um código linguístico com princípios ou mecanismos propósito-específicos, cuja função é a de fornecer evidência para uso na comunicação intencional explícita.…”
unclassified
“…Contrariamente, a função dos signos é a de veicular informação; se assim não o fosse, não haveria razão para continuarem a ser produzidos (e.g. : dança das abelhas para informar a localização do néctar) (Wilson & Wharton, 2006). falante que deseje que algum traço prosódico de sua elocução seja tomado como favorecedor da recuperação de sua intenção deve, portanto, fazer seu melhor para salientá-lo o suficiente, e torná-lo rico o suficiente em efeitos, de modo a ser captado pelo procedimento de compreensão da TR, ajudando a tornar sua elocução tão relevante quanto esperado (Wilson & Wharton, 2006).…”
unclassified