2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10701-010-9510-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic State Reduction Dynamics

Abstract: A mechanism describing state reduction dynamics in relativistic quantum field theory is outlined. The mechanism involves nonlinear stochastic modifications to the standard description of unitary state evolution and the introduction of a relativistic field in which a quantized degree of freedom is associated to each point in spacetime. The purpose of this field is to mediate in the interaction between classical stochastic influences and conventional quantum fields. The equations of motion are Lorentz covariant,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
115
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem is, that in the absence of a well-defined set of rules, it becomes quite unclear whether or not such "predictions" follow or not from the theory without the use of extraneous and ad hoc, but convenient hypothesis suitably introduced in connection to the particular problem at hand. Especially suspicious are, of course, those predictions that are, in fact, retrodictions, and, on this point, we should recall that, long before inflation was invented, Harrison and Zel'dovich [59] had already concluded what should be the form of the primordial spectrum, based on 22 In practice, this view is essentially indistinguishable from the so-called for all practical purposes approach to the matter [58].…”
Section: Predictions and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The problem is, that in the absence of a well-defined set of rules, it becomes quite unclear whether or not such "predictions" follow or not from the theory without the use of extraneous and ad hoc, but convenient hypothesis suitably introduced in connection to the particular problem at hand. Especially suspicious are, of course, those predictions that are, in fact, retrodictions, and, on this point, we should recall that, long before inflation was invented, Harrison and Zel'dovich [59] had already concluded what should be the form of the primordial spectrum, based on 22 In practice, this view is essentially indistinguishable from the so-called for all practical purposes approach to the matter [58].…”
Section: Predictions and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The straightforward relativistic generalization of the CSL model for quantum field theory, starting with the action (6) in the Tomonaga picture for instance, leads to unremovable divergences [65] (see however [69]), even more so when non linearities inherent to general relativity are taken into account.…”
Section: A the Modified Schrödinger Equation For The Mukhanov-sasakimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have based our treatment on a non-relativistic model of spontaneous collapse theory, while a truly satisfactory proposal to deal with the issue should be based on a fully covariant theory. Fortunately, the early studies [54,55], and the recent specific proposals for special relativistic versions of these type of theories [56][57][58][59] indicate that we should be able to address this shortcoming in near future. We just note again that in those theories the interaction picture evolution should be describable in terms of a Tomonaga-Schwinger equation where the interaction hamiltonian is replaced by the corresponding collapse theory density operator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard we note that CSL, in general, leads to small violations of energy conservation, a fact that has led to establish the most stringent bounds on the parameter λ (although modified covariant theories might evade this problems altogether. See for instance discussions in [57,58,61]). Moreover, we note that if there is a small amount of energy remaining inside the black hole region, and very close to the singularity, simply because the positive and negative energy fluxes do not precisely cancel each other, there would be no problem, at least in principle, if such energy were to be radiated after the singularity.…”
Section: Energy Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%