2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.72.024028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic magnetohydrodynamics in dynamical spacetimes: Numerical methods and tests

Abstract: Many problems at the forefront of theoretical astrophysics require the treatment of magnetized fluids in dynamical, strongly curved spacetimes. Such problems include the origin of gamma-ray bursts, magnetic braking of differential rotation in nascent neutron stars arising from stellar core collapse or binary neutron star merger, the formation of jets and magnetized disks around newborn black holes, etc. To model these phenomena, all of which involve both general relativity (GR) and magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
372
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(383 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
11
372
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the density variable is ρ * = α √ γρ 0 u 0 , the momentum-density variable isS i = α √ γT 0 i , the energydensity variable as adopted by Duez et al [16] …”
Section: B Evolution Of the Electromagnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where the density variable is ρ * = α √ γρ 0 u 0 , the momentum-density variable isS i = α √ γT 0 i , the energydensity variable as adopted by Duez et al [16] …”
Section: B Evolution Of the Electromagnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the code of Duez et al [16], additional constraint damping terms are included in the BSSN evolution system, as described in [32,33] (see Eqs. (45) and (46) of [32], Eqs.…”
Section: A Evolution Of the Gravitational Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as for the solenoidal condition for the magnetic field, non-evolutionary constraints must be preserved in the numerical evolution, and computational methods for modern codes are divided into two main classes: 1) free-evolution schemes, mainly based on hyperbolic equations alone, where this problem is alleviated by appropriate reformulations of the equations (BSSN: Shibata & Nakamura 1995;Baumgarte & Shapiro 1999), eventually with the addition of propagating modes and damping terms (Z4: Bona et al 2003;Bernuzzi & Hilditch 2010); 2) fully constrained schemes, where the constraints are enforced at each timestep through the solution of elliptic equations (Bonazzola et al 2004), a more robust but computationally demanding option, since elliptic solvers are notoriously difficult to parallelize. Most of the state-of-the-art 3D codes for GRMHD in dynamical spacetimes are based on freeevolution schemes in Cartesian coordinates (Duez et al 2005;Shibata & Sekiguchi 2005;Anderson et al 2006;Giacomazzo & Rezzolla 2007;Montero et al 2008;Farris et al 2008), and have been used for gravitational collapse in the presence of magnetized plasmas Shibata et al 2006a,b;Stephens et al 2007Stephens et al , 2008, evolution of NSs (Duez et al 2006b;Liebling et al 2010), binary NS mergers (Anderson et al 2008;Liu et al 2008;Giacomazzo et al 2009Giacomazzo et al , 2011, and accreting tori around Kerr BHs (Montero et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also adopted the Harten-Lax-van-LeerEinfeld approximate Riemann solver [36,37]. We also refer to [26,38] for similar treatments and more detailed discussion.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%