2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.73.104015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution of magnetized, differentially rotating neutron stars: Simulations in full general relativity

Abstract: We study the effects of magnetic fields on the evolution of differentially rotating neutron stars, which can be formed in stellar core collapse or binary neutron star coalescence. Magnetic braking and the magnetorotational instability (MRI) both act on differentially rotating stars to redistribute angular momentum. Simulations of these stars are carried out in axisymmetry using our recently developed codes which integrate the coupled Einstein-Maxwell-MHD equations. We consider stars with two different equation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
194
4
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
12
194
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a typical neutron star, we expect a timescale of 10 1 −10 2 yr. In the presence of magnetic fields, the magnetic braking (Spruit 1999) or the magnetorotational instability (MRI) (Balbus & Hawley 1991) may drastically accelerate the redistribution of angular momentum to the order of 1s (Duez et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a typical neutron star, we expect a timescale of 10 1 −10 2 yr. In the presence of magnetic fields, the magnetic braking (Spruit 1999) or the magnetorotational instability (MRI) (Balbus & Hawley 1991) may drastically accelerate the redistribution of angular momentum to the order of 1s (Duez et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as for the solenoidal condition for the magnetic field, non-evolutionary constraints must be preserved in the numerical evolution, and computational methods for modern codes are divided into two main classes: 1) free-evolution schemes, mainly based on hyperbolic equations alone, where this problem is alleviated by appropriate reformulations of the equations (BSSN: Shibata & Nakamura 1995;Baumgarte & Shapiro 1999), eventually with the addition of propagating modes and damping terms (Z4: Bona et al 2003;Bernuzzi & Hilditch 2010); 2) fully constrained schemes, where the constraints are enforced at each timestep through the solution of elliptic equations (Bonazzola et al 2004), a more robust but computationally demanding option, since elliptic solvers are notoriously difficult to parallelize. Most of the state-of-the-art 3D codes for GRMHD in dynamical spacetimes are based on freeevolution schemes in Cartesian coordinates (Duez et al 2005;Shibata & Sekiguchi 2005;Anderson et al 2006;Giacomazzo & Rezzolla 2007;Montero et al 2008;Farris et al 2008), and have been used for gravitational collapse in the presence of magnetized plasmas Shibata et al 2006a,b;Stephens et al 2007Stephens et al , 2008, evolution of NSs (Duez et al 2006b;Liebling et al 2010), binary NS mergers (Anderson et al 2008;Liu et al 2008;Giacomazzo et al 2009Giacomazzo et al , 2011, and accreting tori around Kerr BHs (Montero et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by this expectation, several groups have implemented the magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) code in the framework of numerical relativity [23][24][25][26][27][28]. These numerical codes developed have been applied to collapse of magnetized hypermassive neutron stars (HMNS) [29][30][31], magnetized neutron starblack hole binary merger [32,33], evolution of magnetized neutron stars [34][35][36], and magnetorotational collapse of massive stellar cores [24,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%