2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.194801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic Electron Streaming Instabilities Modulate Proton Beams Accelerated in Laser-Plasma Interactions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now a fundamental impediment of the ongoing research of UHI laser-solid interactions has been the limited experimental capability of diagnosing the basic processes during the laser interaction on the relevant scales that range from sub-femtosecond to hundreds of femtoseconds and from few nanometers to few hundred nanometers. Some of the most important physical processes are, for example, the generation of plasma oscillations [15] and plasma waves [16], electron transport and plasma * .kluge@hzdr.de heating [17,18], instability development [16,[19][20][21][22][23][24], and the generation of strong magnetic fields [17]. A fundamental process is the expansion of the irradiated plasma into vacuum [25][26][27] during the laser interaction, governing the surface dynamics and laser absorption both prior to and during the laser main pulse.For each application a correspondingly tailored surface structure can enhance laser absorption and interaction, electron acceleration, and hence all subsequent processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now a fundamental impediment of the ongoing research of UHI laser-solid interactions has been the limited experimental capability of diagnosing the basic processes during the laser interaction on the relevant scales that range from sub-femtosecond to hundreds of femtoseconds and from few nanometers to few hundred nanometers. Some of the most important physical processes are, for example, the generation of plasma oscillations [15] and plasma waves [16], electron transport and plasma * .kluge@hzdr.de heating [17,18], instability development [16,[19][20][21][22][23][24], and the generation of strong magnetic fields [17]. A fundamental process is the expansion of the irradiated plasma into vacuum [25][26][27] during the laser interaction, governing the surface dynamics and laser absorption both prior to and during the laser main pulse.For each application a correspondingly tailored surface structure can enhance laser absorption and interaction, electron acceleration, and hence all subsequent processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filamented electron beam can drive strong return currents and generate filamentary magnetic field structures which deflect protons away from otherwise uniform trajectories. In addition, the presence of a low density preformed plasma on the rear surface of the target in advance of the peak of the laser pulse has been shown to enhance Weibel-like instability formation that can lead to strong modulations in the accelerated proton beam [45,46]. Even without filamentation, recent work by Nakatsutsumi et al using higher intensities and thinner targets demonstrated that strong azimuthal magnetic fields on the rear surface can inhibit proton acceleration and impact the beam quality [47].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, copious numbers of fast electrons are driven by the laser pulse into the bulk plasma, where they fragment into small-scale magnetic filaments. The scatterings undergone by the fast electrons can lead to large angular divergence, and hence hamper applications involving high electron flux densities, such as the fast ignition scheme [39,40] or ion acceleration [41,42]. On the other hand, the CFI can be purposefully triggered in high-energy laser-driven plasma collisions [43][44][45][46] or relativistic-intensity laser-plasma interactions [47][48][49][50][51], designed as testbeds for astrophysical shock models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%