1991
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative risk of mesothelioma associated with different levels of exposure to asbestos.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, although a wide variety of analytic results have been reported from different laboratories (10,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), it is impossible to determine, without a properly selected reference group analyzed in the same laboratory, whether true elevations of fiber and body counts exist in a population of subjects with mesothelioma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, although a wide variety of analytic results have been reported from different laboratories (10,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), it is impossible to determine, without a properly selected reference group analyzed in the same laboratory, whether true elevations of fiber and body counts exist in a population of subjects with mesothelioma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The relative risk of mesothelioma in relation to lung content of asbestos fibers has been estimated in several studies (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case-control studies, statistically increased risks of mesothelioma have been associated with amphibole fibre levels exceeding 1.0×10 6 fibres (>1 µm)·g -1 dry lung, 0.1-0.2×10 6 fibres (>5 µm)·g -1 dry lung or 0.3-1.0×10 6 fibres (>10 µm)·g -1 dry lung [18][19][20].…”
Section: Malignant Mesotheliomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate exposure assessment is crucial in these cases. Risk estimates of lung cancer and mesothelioma associated with increased pulmonary concentrations of asbestos fibers, as well as reference fiber concentrations observed in the general population, based on results obtained with electron microscopy, have recently been published in Finland (2,3,4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%