1998
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.11061416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for mineral fibre analyses in biological samples: report of the ERS Working Group. European Respiratory Society

Abstract: aaAsbestos comprises a group of six hydrated silicate minerals capable of forming very thin fibres: chrysotile, crocidolite, amosite, anthophyllite, tremolite and actinolite [1]. Chrysotile belongs to the serpentine group and the other five to the amphibole group of minerals. Chrysotile fibre bundles split easily and magnesium can be leached under weak acid conditions. These factors may contribute to the lower biopersistence of chrysotile in the lungs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
107
0
15

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(60 reference statements)
1
107
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Counting asbestos bodies (AB)s in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) by light microscopy can be used to help evaluate an individual9s past exposure to asbestos [7]. ABs mainly reflect exposure to amphibole asbestos.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Counting asbestos bodies (AB)s in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) by light microscopy can be used to help evaluate an individual9s past exposure to asbestos [7]. ABs mainly reflect exposure to amphibole asbestos.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It intersects with the concept of mineralogical analyses of which the usefulness has been perfectly illustrated in the case of asbestosis where the assessment of asbestos bodies (AB) in patient lung tissues or in broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) fluids has allowed defining threshold values specific of pathologies (1000 AB/g in bronchial cancer, 6000 AB/g in mesothelioma and more than 100000 AB/g in asbestos fibrosis against 67 AB/g in healthy control) (De Vuyst et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be noted that the assessment of occupational exposure is based only on the occupation(s) reported by the patient; there was no consideration of duration and intensity of exposure. Moreover, chrysotile fibres were not taken into account in the interpretation of the results of BALF analysis because of the possibility of environmental exposures to chrysotile in some parts of Turkey and the fact that due to a lower biopersistence than that of amphiboles, the chrysotile fibre burden in lung samples is not a reliable marker of exposure [18]. Despite these limitations, an occupational exposure appears very unlikely in a Turkish immigrant when no industrial amphiboles are detected in his BALF (or lung tissue).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%