Volume 1: Turbomachinery 1994
DOI: 10.1115/94-gt-266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Performance Comparison Between Baseline Labyrinth and Dual Brush Compressor Discharge Seals in a T-700 Engine Test

Abstract: In separate series of T-700 engine tests, direct comlxu'isons were made between the forward-facing labyrinth and dual-brush compressor discharge seals. Compressor speeds to 43 000 rpm, surface speeds to 160 m/s (530 ft/s), pressures to 1 MPa (145 psi), and temperatures to 680 K (765 OF)characterizedthese tests. The wear estimate for 40 hr of engine operationswas less than 0.025 mm (0.001 in.) of the Haynes 25 alloy bristles mrmingagainst a chromium-oxide-coatedmb runner. The pressuredrops were higher forthe du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This damping is much larger than was measured for brush seals earlier by Conner and Childs, (1990), with fewer bristles and a different backing plate. It is hypothesized that the bristles became more packed together and held against the backing plate by the pressure drop (Hendricks et. al., 1994).…”
Section: Numerical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This damping is much larger than was measured for brush seals earlier by Conner and Childs, (1990), with fewer bristles and a different backing plate. It is hypothesized that the bristles became more packed together and held against the backing plate by the pressure drop (Hendricks et. al., 1994).…”
Section: Numerical and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…but previous tests (Connor and Childs, 1990) have shown very little damping capacity. More recently, engine tests were made to compare the forward-facing labyrinth seal with dual-brush seals installed as compressor discharge seals (Hendricks, et al, 1994). The leakage of the brush seals was only 40% of the labyrinth leakage, so specific fuel consumption was improved three to five percent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their comparisons between measured and predicted flows through the seal was generally good considering the overall simplicity of their theoretical model. Handericks et al [9] carried out experiments on dual brush and labyrinth compressor discharge seals in a T-700 engine test.. The test condition included compressor discharge pressure up to 1 MPa, temperatures 407C, operating speeds up to 43000 rpm, and surface speeds up to 160 m/s with dry ambient air as the working fluid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An engine with reduced secondary flow leakage past seals produces approximately 4 to 6 percent more power while reducing the specific fuel consumption by 3 to 5 percent. 1, 2 Brush seals have been generating a great deal of interest as replacements for labyrinth seals in secondary air flow systems due to their potential for improved air-to-air sealing and their tolerance of shaft excursions. Current research has demonstrated that a reduction of 90 percent in internal leakage can be obtained by replacing the best knife edged labyrinth seal with a brush seal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%