2004
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-69842004000500018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative efficiency of anuran sampling methods in a restinga habitat (Jurubatiba, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

Abstract: Studies on anurans in restinga habitats are few and, as a result, there is little information on which methods are more efficient for sampling them in this environment. Ten methods are usually used for sampling anuran communities in tropical and sub-tropical areas. In this study we evaluate which methods are more appropriate for this purpose in the restinga environment of Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba. We analyzed six methods among those usually used for anuran samplings. For each method, we record… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Essas diferenças nas taxas de captura podem estar associadas ao tamanho dos recipientes e à quantidade de dias em que as armadilhas permaneceram abertas (ver CECHIN & MARTINS, 2000). Este método é eficiente em ambientes de floresta e de cerrado (CECHIN & MARTINS, 2000), porém foi considerado ineficiente para a restinga (ROCHA et al, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Essas diferenças nas taxas de captura podem estar associadas ao tamanho dos recipientes e à quantidade de dias em que as armadilhas permaneceram abertas (ver CECHIN & MARTINS, 2000). Este método é eficiente em ambientes de floresta e de cerrado (CECHIN & MARTINS, 2000), porém foi considerado ineficiente para a restinga (ROCHA et al, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…BERNARDE (2007) registrou os ambientes de reprodução e a temporada de vocalização das espécies de anuros em uma localidade em Espigão do Oeste. No Brasil, existem poucos estudos sobre a anurofauna de serapilheira que utilizaram armadilhas de interceptação e queda para amostragem (ver CECHIN & MARTINS, 2000;ROCHA et al, 2004;LOEBMANN & VIEIRA, 2005;BRASILEIRO et al, 2005). Neste trabalho, estudou-se a riqueza e diversidade de anfíbios anuros em áreas de floresta e de pastagem em Rondônia e analisou-se a eficiência da utilização de armadilhas de interceptação e queda (pitfall traps with drift fences) na amostragem.…”
unclassified
“…The low species richness obtained using pitfall traps with drift fences was expected, given the limitations imposed by this method (Cechin & Martins 2000), such as its inefficiency to capture arboreal species. According to Rocha et al (2004), only a small fraction of anurans in open sandy coastal plains seems to move on the ground, as a result the pitfall traps method seems to be inefficient to survey anuran species in these environments. However, our records of some terrestrial species and those with explosive reproduction (e.g., Chiasmocleis leucosticta -see Hӧdl 1997, andDendrophryniscus leucomystax -see Zina 2010) support the importance of pitfall traps as a secondary method associated with active search at the reproductive sites (Cechin & Martins 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each area we intensively searched for frogs among the different microhabitats available (i.e. at the border and inside bushes, on branches and trunks of trees/shrubs, on the leaf litter, on bromeliads) following Rocha et al (2004). This method leads to the best sampling of anurans in restinga habitats .…”
Section: Palavras-chavementioning
confidence: 99%