Relative continent/mid-ocean ridge elevation: a reference case for isostasy in geodynamics

Abstract

<p>The choice of crustal and mantle densities in numerical geodynamic models is usually based on convention. The isostatic component of the topography is, however, in most if not all cases not calibrated to fit observations resulting in not very well constrained elevations. The density distribution on Earth is not easy to constrain because it involves multiple variables (temperature, pressure, composition, and deformation). We provide a review and global analysis of the topography of the Earth showing that elevation of stable continents and active mid-ocean ridges far from hotspots on average is +400 m and -2750 m respectively. We show that density values for the crust and mantle, commonly used for isostatic modeling result in highly inaccurate prediction of topography. We use thermodynamic calculations to constrain the density distribution of the continental lithospheric mantle, sub-lithospheric mantle, the mid-ocean ridge mantle, and review data on crustal density. We couple the thermo-dynamic consistent density calculations with 2-D forward geodynamic modelling including melt prediction and calibrate crustal and mantle densities that match the observed elevation difference. Our results can be used as a reference case for geodynamic modeling that accurately fits the relative elevation between continents and mid-ocean ridges consistent with geophysical observations and thermodynamic calculations. </p>

Rifting Venus: Insights from Numerical Modeling

“…In contrast, rifting on Earth in both continental and oceanic settings has been extensively studied through modeling (e.g., Brune & Autin, 2013;Erdős et al, 2014;Theunissen & Huismans, 2019;Sim et al, 2020;Bollino et al, 2022) and observational studies (e.g., Tavani & Muñoz, 2012;Nonn et al, 2019;Zwaan et al, 2020;Peron-Pinvidic et al, 2022) alike. Modeling studies in particular have focused on different aspects of rifting, including the drivers behind large-scale rift deformation and geometry (e.g., Naliboff & Buiter, 2015;Petersen et al, 2018;Tetreault & Buiter, 2018), the accompanying surface expressions (e.g., Beucher & Huismans, 2020;Sternai, 2020;Balázs et al, 2021;Neuharth et al, 2022), and emerging fault patterns (e.g., Sharples et al, 2015;Richter et al, 2021;.…”