2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2021.126317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between N, P, and K in corn biomass for assessing the carryover effects of winter pasture to corn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Providing the quantification relationship among fertilization and crop growth index, Maccari et al (2021) [7] analysed the relationship between N, P, and K in corn biomass as a function of N application, both under pasture (e.g., 0 and 200 kg N ha -1 , black oat) and under grain crop (e.g., 0, 100, 200 and 300 kg N ha -1 , corn) and found a positive relationship between N:P and N:K concentration as a function of increasing N dose under pasture crop. This relationship can eventually be used to diagnose K deficiencies in the case of systems that cover nutrient anticipation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Providing the quantification relationship among fertilization and crop growth index, Maccari et al (2021) [7] analysed the relationship between N, P, and K in corn biomass as a function of N application, both under pasture (e.g., 0 and 200 kg N ha -1 , black oat) and under grain crop (e.g., 0, 100, 200 and 300 kg N ha -1 , corn) and found a positive relationship between N:P and N:K concentration as a function of increasing N dose under pasture crop. This relationship can eventually be used to diagnose K deficiencies in the case of systems that cover nutrient anticipation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In subtropical areas of Brazil, contrary to temperate regions, two or more succeeding crops can be grown in a given year [7]. Therefore, the concept of fertilization systems becomes relevant, with fertilization not being restricted to the nutrient requirements of one crop only (e.g., corn, soybean, cotton) but focusing on the production system as a whole, in which all crops are involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the succession of crops, the bigger amount of biomass cycling by urine and feces must have benefited grain production, and small differences in soil physics, which are not always statistically perceptible, may have promoted grain yield to some degree. According to Maccari et al (2021) in subtropical areas of Brazil, unlike temperate areas, two or more successive crops can be grown in the same year and nutrients applied in one season can be transported to the next season continuously. These authors verified that the transport of nitrogen (N) from a pasture fertilized with N can be considered a viable strategy to reduce N application in maize without harming crop productivity and soil fertility.…”
Section: Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The urea cocrystal and urea + potassium humate treatments resulted in higher silage yields than urea treatments, especially with high N rates of 200 kg ha 1 . The fresh and dry silage yields increased with the modified urea treatments due to the higher N uptake [52] (Table 8). Additionally, in response to using urea + potassium humate and urea cocrystal, there were increases in the corn grain yields by 16.88, 34.75, 24.69, and 40.28%, respectively, compared to the control.…”
Section: Nitrogen Uptake and Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%