2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between labor migration and cropland abandonment in rural China from the perspective of village types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
63
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
7
63
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Combined with the data characteristics of CLDS2014, abandoned farmland is defined as farmland that did not receive any input in 2013 [1,11,13,35,72]. Thus, in this study, the dependent variable is Farmland abandonment, which is defined as the ratio of abandoned farmland area to total farmland area (%), and is calculated as follow Equation (1):…”
Section: Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with the data characteristics of CLDS2014, abandoned farmland is defined as farmland that did not receive any input in 2013 [1,11,13,35,72]. Thus, in this study, the dependent variable is Farmland abandonment, which is defined as the ratio of abandoned farmland area to total farmland area (%), and is calculated as follow Equation (1):…”
Section: Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with other studies, we found there is heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of regional farmland abandonment [21] in Sichuan Province. Ding (2019) found that the regions with relatively large cropland abandonment rates and size are mainly distributed in the west and south of China (e.g., Sichuan Province, Chongqing Municipality), while the rate of cropland abandonment in the north and northeast area of China is relatively low [46]. Farmland abandonment in Japan exhibits a significantly uneven pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of this possibility, the present study used type IV Tobit models to re-estimate the models. The selection of the instrumental variables was based on the methodology described by [6,8,16,17,56,57], and the average land management scale of other rural households in the same village (other than this rural household) was taken as the land management scale of this rural household to obtain the instrumental variables.…”
Section: Robustness Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, for rural households in the starting, rearing, burden, stable, and maintenance periods, the proportion of agricultural cash income in the total family cash income decreased, on average, by 6.8%, 6.7%, 9.2%, 3.5%, and 16.3%, respectively.Land 2020, 9, 11 2 of 15 of livelihood strategies [1][2][3][4]. Many of the livelihood strategies of rural households have gradually changed, from agriculturally based to non-agriculturally based [5][6][7][8][9]. However, owing to the long-term, urban-rural dual division system (especially the household registration system), labor migration and land use in China are different from those in other countries [4,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%