2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between interfacial shear stresses and moment capacities of RC beams strengthened with various types of FRP sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In brief, these results were consistent with the previous literature regarding the influential factors on debonding failure, which is significantly affected by the maximum interfacial stress [ 40 , 56 , 57 ] but insensitive to changes in fracture energy and mixed-mode failure criteria [ 53 ]. However, disagreement can also be observed once the global response of the strengthened slab with a hybrid retrofit system was found to be impacted by changing the criteria of the stiffness of interface elements and damage initiation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In brief, these results were consistent with the previous literature regarding the influential factors on debonding failure, which is significantly affected by the maximum interfacial stress [ 40 , 56 , 57 ] but insensitive to changes in fracture energy and mixed-mode failure criteria [ 53 ]. However, disagreement can also be observed once the global response of the strengthened slab with a hybrid retrofit system was found to be impacted by changing the criteria of the stiffness of interface elements and damage initiation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Many studies on FRP-strengthened flexural members have demonstrated that both their strength and stiffness increase significantly after strengthening. However, the strengthening effectiveness and mechanical behaviour of the strengthened beam or slab are greatly affected by the interfacial bond performance (Achillopoulou et al, 2016; Gao et al, 2007; Kim et al, 2015; Sayin and Manisali, 2010; Tounsi and Benyoucef, 2007; Xie et al, 2017). When the interfacial principal stress exceeds the bond strength of the FRP/concrete interface, premature brittle debonding failure may occur unless reliable additional anchoring measures (Oller et al, 2011; Smith and Teng, 2002; Teng and Chen, 2008; Zhou et al, 2017a, 2017b) are provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, one of the primary reasons retrofitted slabs failed to achieve their ultimate carrying capacity was a premature debonding failure between CFRP and overlay interface [ 18 ]. A specialized adhesive layer permits interfacial stress to be transferred from slab to CFRP or vice versa more effectively than from CFRP to overlay concrete, resulting in a higher potential debonding failure between overlay and CFRP [ 19 , 20 ]. Moon et al [ 21 ] also suggested using shear connectors to enhance the bond strength and flexural carrying capacity of retrofitted slabs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%