2000
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2000122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between forest tree species, stand production and stand nutrient amount

Abstract: -Data from the literature concerning stand aerial biomass, stand nutrient amount (i.e. N, P, K, Ca and Mg) of four major forest tree species of the temperate area were compiled in order to propose simple general relationships to quantify nutrient depletion associated with biomass harvesting. The objectives was to identify the tree species effect on nutrient loss through biomass removal. Mean weighted nutrient concentrations of aerial biomass decreased rapidly until the maximum current annual increment of stand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(18 reference statements)
3
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, nutrient concentrations of plant parts, Pinus sylvestris, (e.g. needles, wood) have not been observed to show a decreasing trend with stand age (Helmisaari 1990, Helmisaari 1992, Augusto et al 2000). The ratio of stand level needle mass to fine root mass, often interpreted as an indicator of nutrient availability (Santantonio 1989), has also been observed to be relatively independent of stand age in Pinus sylvestris (Vanninen and Mäkelä 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, nutrient concentrations of plant parts, Pinus sylvestris, (e.g. needles, wood) have not been observed to show a decreasing trend with stand age (Helmisaari 1990, Helmisaari 1992, Augusto et al 2000). The ratio of stand level needle mass to fine root mass, often interpreted as an indicator of nutrient availability (Santantonio 1989), has also been observed to be relatively independent of stand age in Pinus sylvestris (Vanninen and Mäkelä 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WTH causes greater nutrient removals than SOH because nutrient concentrations are generally higher in foliage and branches than in stems (Mälkönen 1974;Mälkönen and Saarsalmi 1982;Kubin 1983;Finér 1989). The developmental stage of the stand, in turn, affects biomass allocation and nutrient contents (Mälkönen 1974;Helmisaari 1995;Augusto et al 2000). The proportion of nutrient-rich crown and bark out of the total biomass decreases as a stand ages (Albrektson 1980;Hakkila 1989;Vanninen et al 1996) and accordingly also the nutrient amount per unit of stem and total biomass (Augusto et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, wood itself is not necessarily homogeneous with respect to mineral element concentrations (Hillis 1987, Myre et al 1994. There is a higher of P, N and K concentration in sapwood compared to heartwood for oakwood (Attiwill 1980, Augusto et al 2000, Penninckx et al 2001.…”
Section: Universidad Del Bío -Bíomentioning
confidence: 99%