1977
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1977.43.4.603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships among glottis opening, respiratory flow, and upper airway resistance in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

7
49
3

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
49
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the average area of the glottis aperture as measured by our image-based method with 10 healthy human subjects was 0.98 cm 2 . This estimation was in good agreement with that from computational calculation by Rigau et al 13 In addition, the change wave of the quanti¯ed area of glottis aperture opening as obtained by our imagebased assessment clearly revealed that the glottis aperture opened on inspiration and narrowed on expiration during quiet breathing, which was in agreement with previous visual observations reported by Baier et al 26 and Brancatisano et al 27 It should be noted that while the measurement was highly reproducible for a given individual, the variations between individual subjects were considerably large ($30%). These large variations could be in part due to the small sample size (n ¼ 10) used in this study, or the inherent di®erence in the airway anatomies between the individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, the average area of the glottis aperture as measured by our image-based method with 10 healthy human subjects was 0.98 cm 2 . This estimation was in good agreement with that from computational calculation by Rigau et al 13 In addition, the change wave of the quanti¯ed area of glottis aperture opening as obtained by our imagebased assessment clearly revealed that the glottis aperture opened on inspiration and narrowed on expiration during quiet breathing, which was in agreement with previous visual observations reported by Baier et al 26 and Brancatisano et al 27 It should be noted that while the measurement was highly reproducible for a given individual, the variations between individual subjects were considerably large ($30%). These large variations could be in part due to the small sample size (n ¼ 10) used in this study, or the inherent di®erence in the airway anatomies between the individuals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Larger Rrs,e than Rrs,i at baseline are in keeping with prior reports from the literature [2,4,5]. Lung volume, a major determinant of airway resistance, would be unlikely to play a significant role, provided the time-triggered signal sampling did not bias the computation of tidal volume, due to asymmetry of breathing flow between inspiration and expiration.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Owing to the fact that measurements are performed during tidal breathing, the upper airway may significantly impact on the respiratory resistance (Rrs) [1,2]. The glottic aperture narrows during tidal expiration [3], contributing to Rrs being larger than in inspiration [2,4,5]. Acute bronchial obstruction promotes further laryngeal narrowing [6][7][8], which is expected to impact the Rrs measured during expiration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rrs showed significant flow dependence and Mch was associated with an increase in K1 and K2, which are both determined by Reynolds number [24]. The latter increases with induced airway obstruction, and turbulent flow extends to parts of the airways in which it was previously laminar [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%