2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship patterns in the 19th century: The friendship network in a German boys’ school class from 1880 to 1881 revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Class network results confirmed the previous research [20]. The researchers described the "repeaters" as pupils who often led games and were strong, lively, and energetic, especially outside of the classroom.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The Class network results confirmed the previous research [20]. The researchers described the "repeaters" as pupils who often led games and were strong, lively, and energetic, especially outside of the classroom.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This problem of interpreting non-reported relationships is highlighted when respondents give discrepant reports about whether or not they are friends with each other (Adams & Moody, 2007;Vaquera & Kao, 2008), resulting in the very common but awkward belief among network analysts that "friendship" is a directed relationship, where person C can be best friends with person D while D has exactly zero relationship with C. Scholars typically assume the one-directional friendship has been measured without error, that the "present" C→D tie works just like any other directed tie and the "absent" D→C tie works just like any other non-tie (Cheadle & Schwadel, 2012;Frank, Muller, & Mueller, 2013;Heidler, Gamper, Herz, & Eßer, 2014;Mouw & Entwisle, 2006). 2 With the ubiquitous slip of interpreting relationships as interaction, a scholar would then assume that C spends time with D but D does not spend time with C, C can send information to D but D cannot send information to C, etc.…”
Section: Social Ties As Socially Constructed Role Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the survey data, however, the networks constructed from observed behavior can use a specific and rigorously applied definition of social ties, not vulnerable to differences of construal among the various survey respondents. Real-time applications can use multiple observers and sophisticated coding schemes to record social interaction for later aggregation into networks, and networks can even be constructed and analyzed from ethnographic or archived historical accounts (Heidler et al, 2014).…”
Section: Social Ties As Behavioral Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest extends beyond school settings (e.g., Borgatti et al 2009;Christakis and Fowler 2009), but as Heidler et al (2014) pointed out, the first attempt to study networks empirically was actually conducted in a school. The basic assumption of network studies is that knowledge about social affiliations makes it possible to forecast how well students will fare in school over time.…”
Section: Network Of Interpersonal Relationships At Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%