Relationship of Periapical Lesion Radiologic Size, Apical Resection, and Retrograde Filling With the Prognosis of Periapical Surgery

Peñarrocha, Miguel; Martí, Eva; García, Berta

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.058

Cited by 38 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…All review articles that appeared in the MEDLINE search engine link were evaluated, and their reference lists were hand-checked. Additional 7 studies were identified (9,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Outcome of Surgical Endodontic Treatment Performed by a Modern Technique: A Meta-analysis of Literature

Tsesis

Faivishevsky

Kfir

et al. 2009

Journal of Endodontics

120

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Outcome of Surgical Endodontic Treatment Performed by a Modern Technique: A Meta-analysis of Literature

Tsesis

Faivishevsky

Kfir

et al. 2009

Journal of Endodontics

120

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In the following decades, it has been applied to the following more challenging oral surgical procedures: alveolar ridge expansion (Blus and Szmukler-Moncler, 2006;Schlee et al, 2006) exposure of impacted canines (Grenga and Bovi, 2004), lateralisation of the inferior alveolar nerve (Bovi, 2005), sinus lifts for the placement of implants (Eggers et al, 2004;Stübinger et al, 2005;Barone et al, 2008), endodontic and periodontal surgery (Vercellotti and Pollack, 2006;Peñarrocha et al, 2007), and to harvest autologous bone grafts (Sohn et al, 2007). The end of the second millennium saw the growing clinical introduction of the ultrasonic scalpel (Shelley and Shelley, 1986;Lee and Park, 1999;Gonzalez-Garcia et al, 2009), and it has become competitive with conventional instruments in maxillo-facial surgery for orthognathic operations in certain frameworks (Stübinger et al, 2005;Kotrikova et al, 2006;Landes et al, 2008aLandes et al, , 2008bBeziat et al, 2009;Gilles et al, 2013;Hoffmann et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of piezosurgery and traditional saw in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery

Spinelli

Lazzeri

Conti

et al. 2014

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tPurpose: Investigators have hypothesised that piezoelectric surgical device could permanently replace traditional saws in conventional orthognathic surgery. Methods: Twelve consecutive patients who underwent bimaxillary procedures were involved in the study. In six patients the right maxillary and mandible osteotomies were performed using traditional saw, whilst the left osteotomies by piezoosteotomy; in the remaining six patients, the surgical procedures were reversed. Intraoperative blood loss, procedure duration time, incision precision, postoperative swelling and haematoma, and nerve impairment were evaluated to compare the outcomes and costs of these two procedures. Results: Compare to traditional mechanical surgery, piezoosteotomy showed a significant intraoperative blood loss reduction of 25% (p ¼ 0.0367), but the mean surgical procedure duration was longer by 35% (p ¼ 0.0018). Moreover, the use of piezoosteotomy for mandible procedure required more time than for the maxillary surgery (p ¼ 0.0003). There was a lower incidence of postoperative haematoma and swelling following piezoosteotomy, and a statistically significant reduction in postoperative nerve impairment (p ¼ 0.003). Conclusions: We believe that piezoelectric device allows surgeons to achieve better results compared to a traditional surgical saw, especially in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative swelling and nerve impairment. This device represents a less aggressive and safer method to perform invasive surgical procedures such as a Le Fort I osteotomy. However, we recommend the use of traditional saw in mandible surgery because it provides more foreseeable outcomes and well-controlled osteotomy. Further studies are needed to analyse whether piezoosteotomy could prevent relapse and promote bony union in larger advancements. Ó

show abstract

“…In other studies, the outcome was not correlated with the size of the periapical lesion (8)(9)(10). Widening the scope to traditional apical surgery, some authors noted that the size of the lesion was related to the outcome (11,12); however, opposite results were reported as well (13,14).…”

mentioning

confidence: 96%

Influence of Size and Volume of Periapical Lesions on the Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery: 3-Dimensional Analysis Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Kim

Nam

et al. 2016

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Relationship of Periapical Lesion Radiologic Size, Apical Resection, and Retrograde Filling With the Prognosis of Periapical Surgery

Cited by 38 publications

References 11 publications

Outcome of Surgical Endodontic Treatment Performed by a Modern Technique: A Meta-analysis of Literature

Outcome of Surgical Endodontic Treatment Performed by a Modern Technique: A Meta-analysis of Literature

Comparison of piezosurgery and traditional saw in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery

Influence of Size and Volume of Periapical Lesions on the Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery: 3-Dimensional Analysis Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About