2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2013.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship of local incidence angle with satellite radar backscatter for different surface conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiments, using a single threshold resulted in missing water bodies in the far range, because there were no seeds captured: the threshold value excluded more pixels on open water in the far range, which usually has lower signal to noise ratios and higher calibration uncertainty. Work by O'Grady et al [21,46] also concluded that there are variations in the backscatter based on the incidence angle, given the varying noise levels of the scene. Another drawback of threshold-based methods for water mapping from SAR is that the threshold used for water mapping is severely affected by the noise (and noise floor) of the scene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiments, using a single threshold resulted in missing water bodies in the far range, because there were no seeds captured: the threshold value excluded more pixels on open water in the far range, which usually has lower signal to noise ratios and higher calibration uncertainty. Work by O'Grady et al [21,46] also concluded that there are variations in the backscatter based on the incidence angle, given the varying noise levels of the scene. Another drawback of threshold-based methods for water mapping from SAR is that the threshold used for water mapping is severely affected by the noise (and noise floor) of the scene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is believed that the rate of backscatter change with local incidence angle may provide a better means to map the water extents than a single threshold on backscatter alone [41]. Therefore, our future work will investigate robust water mapping methodologies that involve more variables, such as local incidence angle, terrain indices, or any other useful information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The t-test was conducted using equation 1. SAR data is known to be sensitive not just to cover type but also structure of the objects which contribute to the volume of the scattering process (Cloude, 2010;O'Grady et al, 2013). This concept was linked to the backscatter values recorded for some of the permanent classes such as settlement, waterbody and even the crop fields on the 2016 classified composite image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%