Relationship-building around a policy decision-support tool for urban health

Deloly, Clément; Gall, Anne Roué Le; Moore, Gemma; Bretelle, Lucy; Milner, James; Mohajeri, Nahid; Osrin, David; Salvia, Giuseppe; Symonds, P.; Tsoulou, Ioanna; Zimmermann, Nicole; Wilkinson, Paul; Davies, Martin

doi:10.5334/bc.110

Cited by 5 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…DSTs can play an important role in transferring information and knowledge to policy and decision makers on road safety, health services, environmental and urban health [ 145 – 149 ] (Additional file 13 : Appendix 13). DSTs assessed in the included studies were the CRAFT tool [ 148 ], the HENVINET DST MDB [ 150 ], the NHS Scotland DST Platform [ 148 ], the SOMNet, combined with the EbCA [ 149 ] and the European Road Safety Decision Support System [ 147 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review

El-Jardali,

Bou-Karroum,

Hilal

et al. 2023

Health Res Policy Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Knowledge management (KM) emerged as a strategy to promote evidence-informed decision-making. This scoping review aims to map existing KM tools and mechanisms used to promote evidence-informed health decision-making in the WHO European Region and identify knowledge gaps. Methods Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for conducting scoping reviews, we searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and Open Grey. We conducted a descriptive analysis of the general characteristics of the included papers and conducted narrative analysis of the included studies and categorized studies according to KM type and phase. Results Out of 9541 citations identified, we included 141 studies. The KM tools mostly assessed are evidence networks, surveillance tools, observatories, data platforms and registries, with most examining KM tools in high-income countries of the WHO European region. Findings suggest that KM tools can identify health problems, inform health planning and resource allocation, increase the use of evidence by policymakers and stimulate policy discussion. Conclusion Policymakers and funding agencies are called to support capacity-building activities, and future studies to strengthen KM in the WHO European region particularly in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. An updated over-arching strategy to coordinate KM activities in the WHO European region will be useful in these efforts.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review

El-Jardali,

Bou-Karroum,

Hilal

et al. 2023

Health Res Policy Sys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to the OECD classification, five studies reported data from a large metropolitan area ( 28 , 31 , 37 , 38 , 41 ). Sobral, Richmond, Rennes, Bristol, Ljubljana and Sosnowiec were classified as medium-sized urban areas ( 27 , 30 , 32 , 42 ); Barcelona, San Francisco, Lisbon, Detroit and Amsterdam were classified as metropolitan areas ( 33 , 36 , 40 , 42 ); and Noarlunga, Gulfport, Hermosa Beach, Redondo Beach and Manhattan Beach as small-size urban areas ( 29 , 34 , 43 ). Matsapha and Vancouver were classified as other urban settings ( 35 , 39 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Multisectoral action was the strategy most frequently reported. As a lone process, multisectoral action to advance the construction of a healthy city was addressed in six (35%) studies ( 30 – 32 , 35 , 36 , 41 ). Five studies assessed both multisectoral action and health governance ( 27 , 29 , 33 , 38 , 39 ); three reported data on multisectoral action and civic engagement ( 34 , 37 , 40 ), and the same amount of studies assessed only civic engagement ( 28 , 42 , 43 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Urban Governance, Multisectoral Action, and Civic Engagement for Population Health, Wellbeing, and Equity in Urban Settings: A Systematic Review

Mesa-Vieira,

Gonzalez-Jaramillo,

Díaz-Ríos

et al. 2023

Int J Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To identify the validated and reliable indicators and tools to assess good governance for population health, wellbeing, and equity in urban settings, and assess processes of multisectoral action and civic engagement as reported by peer-reviewed articles.Methods: We conducted a systematic review searching six databases for observational studies reporting strategies of either urban health, multisectoral action or civic engagement for wellbeing, health, or equity.Results: Out of 8,154 studies initially identified we included 17. From the included studies, 14 presented information about high-income countries. The general population was the main target in most studies. Multisectoral action was the most frequently reported strategy (14 studies). Three studies used Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (Urban HEART). Health indicators were the most frequently represented (6 studies). Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of participatory health governance strategies were reported in 12 studies.Conclusion: Data on the implementation of participatory health governance strategies has been mainly reported in high-income countries. Updated and reliable data, measured repeatedly, is needed to closely monitor these processes and further develop indicators to assess their impact on population health, wellbeing, and equity.

show abstract

“…At the programme level, we apply a multi-sited ethnographic approach, which operates in diverse locations, especially in order to understand ways for strategic collaborations between researchers and participants to emerge from the fieldwork [66,67]. This is suitable for addressing the transdisciplinary, multi-agency and multi-context international nature of the programme [68]. Within this particular case study, we are using rapid ethnography.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding Urban Green Space Usage through Systems Thinking: A Case Study in Thamesmead, London

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban green spaces provide environmental, economic, societal and health benefits to cities. However, policy and planning interventions aiming to improve usage have often led to unintended consequences, including, in some circumstances, an actual decline in usage. Previous research has identified factors influencing the use of urban green space, more often with a focus on the ‘quality’ and physical features of the space, rather than on the broader social factors. This study aims to unpack the complexity of factors that influence the use of urban green space through the application of Systems Thinking. A qualitative mixed-method approach integrating System Dynamics with rapid ethnography was adopted to elicit the views of local residents in Thamesmead, London. A thematic analysis of interviews was undertaken to systematically map the causal relations between factors, which were compared to wider stakeholders’ views. Our findings highlight the relevance of dynamics and social influences on the use of green space, which include social interactions and stewardship, health conditions, availability of services and amenities. These are factors that are underexplored in the literature and, sometimes, overlooked in urban green space policy by decision-makers. We infer that attendance of urban green spaces requires time, which may be occupied in other practices determined by local conditions and needs. Expanding the spatial and temporal boundaries of investigation, wider than debates on ‘quality’, should, in our view, increase the chances of identifying critical influences and foster an increased use of green space.

show abstract

Relationship-building around a policy decision-support tool for urban health

Cited by 5 publications

References 39 publications

Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review

Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review

Urban Governance, Multisectoral Action, and Civic Engagement for Population Health, Wellbeing, and Equity in Urban Settings: A Systematic Review

Understanding Urban Green Space Usage through Systems Thinking: A Case Study in Thamesmead, London

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About