DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70585-7_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Viewing Distance and Visual Fatigue in Relation to Feeling of Involvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several studies discussed the effect of VD on blinking rate, heart rate variability (level of sympathetic nerve activity: LF/HF), and task performance (watching and answering about TV shows; Sakamoto et al, 2009). Sakamoto, Aoyama, Asahara, Yamashita, and Okada (2008) reported that the optimal VD lies between 3 and 4 times the display height (Sakamoto et al, 2008). In contrary, Ankrum (1996) suggested that the proper VD for a computer workstation was at 25 in.…”
Section: Investigating Factors Affecting the Proposed Multiple Performentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies discussed the effect of VD on blinking rate, heart rate variability (level of sympathetic nerve activity: LF/HF), and task performance (watching and answering about TV shows; Sakamoto et al, 2009). Sakamoto, Aoyama, Asahara, Yamashita, and Okada (2008) reported that the optimal VD lies between 3 and 4 times the display height (Sakamoto et al, 2008). In contrary, Ankrum (1996) suggested that the proper VD for a computer workstation was at 25 in.…”
Section: Investigating Factors Affecting the Proposed Multiple Performentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TV watching experience comprises diverse elements. In previous studies on TV watching experience, presence [1,[16][17][18][19], visual comfort [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], image quality [17,27,28], satisfaction [26], visual fatigue [26,[29][30][31], motion sickness [16], empirical 3-dimensional (3D) image distortion [21], and emotional reactions [28] were considered. User satisfaction is used to explain the overall quality of experience with visual display products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although presence increases as viewing distance decreases, it can suffer at excessively short viewing distances [36,37]. Studies on non-high definition (HD) flat TVs have involved viewing distances of 2-14 W [38,39] and 5 H [40], where W and H respectively represent display width and height, whereas HD TV studies have used shorter viewing distances (3-4 W or 0.8-6 H) [27,[41][42][43][44][45][46]. No study, however, has addressed the interactive effect of viewing distance and display curvature radius on TV watching experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pointed out the recommended viewing distance was 2 H or 3 H for HDTV. Sakamoto et al . revealed that the viewing fatigue was the lowest when viewing distance was between 3 H and 4 H .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narita et al 16 pointed out the recommended viewing distance was 2H or 3H for HDTV. Sakamoto et al 17 revealed that the viewing fatigue was the lowest when viewing distance was between 3H and 4H. Lee 18 explored the effect of TV size, illumination, and viewing angle on preferred viewing distance in HDTV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%