2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00732-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between tumor mutational burden and maximum standardized uptake value in 2-[18F]FDG PET (positron emission tomography) scan in cancer patients

Abstract: Purpose Deriving links between imaging and genomic markers is an evolving field. 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography–computed tomography) is commonly used for cancer imaging, with maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as the main quantitative parameter. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), the quantitative variable obtained using next-generation sequencing on a tissue biopsy sample, is a putative immunotherapy response predictor. We report the relationship betw… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While SUV appears to be inversely correlated to response to ICI [ 66 , 70 , 80 ] with higher SUV values being in some reports indicative of treatment benefit, on the other hand higher MTV and TLG values result in negative predictive factors for patient outcome during ICI ( Table 2 ). Recently, a linear positive correlation between SUVmax and tumor mutational burden (TMB), which represents one of the prognostic markers of response to immunotherapy, has been reported ( p < 0.001) [ 95 ]. These data are in line with previous findings reporting a paradoxically higher SUV in patients responding to ICI, particularly referring to NSCLC [ 66 , 70 , 96 ].…”
Section: Combined Parameters For Outcome Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While SUV appears to be inversely correlated to response to ICI [ 66 , 70 , 80 ] with higher SUV values being in some reports indicative of treatment benefit, on the other hand higher MTV and TLG values result in negative predictive factors for patient outcome during ICI ( Table 2 ). Recently, a linear positive correlation between SUVmax and tumor mutational burden (TMB), which represents one of the prognostic markers of response to immunotherapy, has been reported ( p < 0.001) [ 95 ]. These data are in line with previous findings reporting a paradoxically higher SUV in patients responding to ICI, particularly referring to NSCLC [ 66 , 70 , 96 ].…”
Section: Combined Parameters For Outcome Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High SUVmax was also significantly correlated with NLR, a biomarker with both prognostic and predictive value in patients with HNSCC treated with ICI . There was no association between SUVmax and TMB, despite previous studies suggesting an association in other cancer types …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…3,4 There was no association between SUVmax and TMB, despite previous studies suggesting an association in other cancer types. 5 Studies examining the prognostic value of SUVmax in HNSCC have produced mixed results. In the context of ICI, we hypothesize that higher levels of systemic inflammation, of which NLR is a surrogate marker, may in part be reflected in higher lesional SUVmax.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TLG can reflect both volume and metabolic activity of lesions, which can reflect the advantage of PET/CT better. While SUV max , MTV, and TLG are established as parameters to assess for diagnosis, efficacy, prognosis, tumor burden, and TMB in cancer ( 32 , 33 ), they have limited value in judging IMH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%