2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2852-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between thoracic hypokyphosis, lumbar lordosis and sagittal pelvic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Abstract: We can consider that the proximal part of the lordosis depends on the thoracic kyphosis and the distal part depends on the pelvic incidence. The hypokyphosis in AIS is independent of the pelvic parameters and could be described as a structural parameter, characteristic of the scoliotic deformity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In these studies, the patients with scoliosis had a moderate to severe thoracic curve (mean Cobb angles varied between 35° and 60°); however, Schlösser et al [15] included only mild curves (Cobb angle 20° or lower) and found similar results (PI for thoracic AIS patients: 47°, PI for (thoraco)lumbar AIS patients: 42° and PI for controls: 43°; without significant differences). It has been described that the PI in AIS is higher as compared to the non-scoliotic controls; however, others described no significant differences between AIS patients and non-scoliotic adolescents [1,10,13,19,21,27,28]. Slight PI differences among studies could be explained by the differences in age, since the PI increases with age, but also to the inaccuracy of the 2D method [16,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In these studies, the patients with scoliosis had a moderate to severe thoracic curve (mean Cobb angles varied between 35° and 60°); however, Schlösser et al [15] included only mild curves (Cobb angle 20° or lower) and found similar results (PI for thoracic AIS patients: 47°, PI for (thoraco)lumbar AIS patients: 42° and PI for controls: 43°; without significant differences). It has been described that the PI in AIS is higher as compared to the non-scoliotic controls; however, others described no significant differences between AIS patients and non-scoliotic adolescents [1,10,13,19,21,27,28]. Slight PI differences among studies could be explained by the differences in age, since the PI increases with age, but also to the inaccuracy of the 2D method [16,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Most studies described a relation between the PI and the (thoraco)lumbar sagittal alignment, but not between the PI and the thoracic alignment [10,13,17,19,21,27,30]. This suggests that the PI influences the (thoraco) lumbar region of the spine, but the thoracic part is independent of the PI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Modern classification systems are based on coronal (AP or PA), sagittal and dynamic radiographs [9], and new insights regarding sagittal alignment of spinal deformities require a full spine lateral radiograph with the hips visible [10,11]. According to a prospective study by Horton et al [12], the best position for taking these radiographs is with the hands on the clavicles.…”
Section: Supporting Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%