1968
DOI: 10.1038/219646b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between the Papain Sensitivity of Human γG Immunoglobulins and their Heavy Chain Subclass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, IgGl and IgG3 are readily digested by papain, whereas IgG2 and IgG4 are more resistant [ 9 ] . With respect to complement fixation, IgG3 followed by IgCl are the most effective, IgG2 less so and lgG4 virtually inactive [ 10, 1 I].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, IgGl and IgG3 are readily digested by papain, whereas IgG2 and IgG4 are more resistant [ 9 ] . With respect to complement fixation, IgG3 followed by IgCl are the most effective, IgG2 less so and lgG4 virtually inactive [ 10, 1 I].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IgG2-rich fraction was eluted between pH 5.2 and pH 4.6, whereas the corresponding IgG1-rich fraction was eluted between pH 4.6 and pH 4.0. Contaminating IgG1 in the IgG2 fraction was removed by papain (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) digestion in the absence of any reducing agents (enzyme:substrate ¼ 1:100) for 16 h. The IgG2 is resistant to papain digestion at nonreducing conditions [20]. All fractions were concentrated with ultrafiltration (Ultrahülsen: Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany), dialysed against PBS pH 7.4 without a preservative, aliquoted and stored at ¹20ЊC.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remainder are, in general, more susceptible to peptic digestion than either colostral or serum IgA. Precedent for varying susceptibility of immunoglobulins to enzymatic digestion can be found in the relationships between sensitivity to papain and the heavy-chain subclass of IgG (25). It should be noted that relative susceptibility of these proteins to peptic digestion, as measured by both the TCA and the Sephadex G200 methods, may reflect the position rather than the number of peptide bonds hydrolyzed (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%