2008
DOI: 10.1029/2007jc004325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between the irradiance reflectance and inherent optical properties of seawater

Abstract: [1] A new expression for relationship between the surface irradiance reflectance and Inherent Optical Properties (IOPs) of homogeneous seawater is presented. Physical parameters largely responsible for the relationship are identified. These are the average cosines of the backward volume scattering function and of the downward radiance. Lorenz-Mie computations show that the average cosine of the backward volume scattering function is quasi-constant (0.493 ± 0.135) for most marine waters, even if the backward vo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Santa Barbara Channel, the downwelling and upwelling radiance distribution were measured separately in time, so did not give an accurate estimate for d . We started the inversion with the following expression [ Hirata and Højerslev , 2008], K d ( z ) d ≈ a ( z ) + b b ( z ), where b b represents the backscattering coefficient and this expression holds for surface waters where E od ≫ E ou holds. Figure 8b shows the results for ( a + b b ) in the Channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Santa Barbara Channel, the downwelling and upwelling radiance distribution were measured separately in time, so did not give an accurate estimate for d . We started the inversion with the following expression [ Hirata and Højerslev , 2008], K d ( z ) d ≈ a ( z ) + b b ( z ), where b b represents the backscattering coefficient and this expression holds for surface waters where E od ≫ E ou holds. Figure 8b shows the results for ( a + b b ) in the Channel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Santa Barbara Channel, the downwelling and upwelling radiance distribution were measured separately in time, so did not give an accurate estimate for d . We started the inversion with the following expression [Hirata and Højerslev, 2008]…”
Section: Inherent Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated Z SD according to the equation of Preisendorfer [1986] with Γ calculated by with the beam attenuation coefficient c (= a + b ) and K d evaluated at 555 nm, close to the most penetrating wavelength in middle and lower Chesapeake Bay, and at the maximum sensitivity of the light‐adapted human eye [ Davies‐Colley et al , 2003]. We assumed a contrast threshold, C t = 0.066, disk reflectivity, R disk = 0.82 [ Davies‐Colley and Vant , 1988], and calculated in situ reflectance by with f ′ evaluated according to Morel and Gentili [1993] as cited by Hirata and Højerslev [2008].…”
Section: Bio‐optical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where f indicates the relationship between irradiance reflectance and IOPs ( [74] and references therein) and Q (ratio of upwelling radiance to irradiance) [75] represents the directional nature of upwelling light field. The term f/Q is equivalent to G0(uT) + G1(uT), and r rs (0−) could be rewritten as below:…”
Section: Relationship Between Underwater Remote Sensing Reflectance Amentioning
confidence: 99%