Relationship between static and dynamic visual acuity.

Weissman, Seymour; Freeburne, Cecil M.

doi:10.1037/h0022214

Cited by 30 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Therefore, it can be difficult to compare accurately data of published reports. In contrast, other studies have demonstrated a small but significant relationship between these types of acuity (Burg & Hulbert, 1961;Weissman & Freeburne, 1965;Burg, 1966). (miekonakatsukaG3 hotmail.com).…”

mentioning

confidence: 88%

Effect of Static Visual Acuity on Dynamic Visual Acuity: A Pilot Study

Nakatsuka¹,

Ueda²,

Nawa³

et al. 2006

Percept Mot Skills

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate whether dynamic visual acuity changes with or without refractive correction. 42 healthy enrolled subjects with normal vision were divided into two age-matched groups. In Group A, dynamic visual acuity was measured first with the refractive error fully corrected and then without. In Group B, dynamic visual acuity measurements were taken in the reverse order of that performed by Group A. The measurements were binocularly performed five times using free-head viewing after dynamic visual acuity values were stable. Significant changes in dynamic visual acuity (static visual acuity 20/20 vs 12/20) were observed in both Group A (171.6 +/- 36.0 deg./sec. vs 151.8 +/- 39.6 deg./sec., Wilcoxon test, p < .001) and Group B (169.8 +/- 30.0 deg./sec. vs 151.2 +/- 36.0 deg./sec., Wilcoxon test, p < .001). The interaction was significant (F1.20 = 8.12, p = .009). These results indicated that refractive correction affected dynamic visual acuity.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 88%

Effect of Static Visual Acuity on Dynamic Visual Acuity: A Pilot Study

Nakatsuka¹,

Ueda²,

Nawa³

et al. 2006

Percept Mot Skills

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Weissman and Freeburne reported that static acuity had a significant linear relationship at the first four speeds (20, 60, 90, 120°/s) and disappeared at the two highest speed (150 and 180°/s) among female college students. [ 3 ] Kakiyama et al . showed high correlation between static visual acuity (SVA) and kinetic visual acuity among high school rugby players (0.798, P < 0.001).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing sports vision among three groups of soft tennis adolescent athletes: Normal vision, refractive errors with and without correction

Chang

Liu

et al. 2015

Indian J Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The effect of correcting static vision on sports vision is still not clear.Aim:To examine whether sports vision (depth perception [DP], dynamic visual acuity [DVA], eye movement [EM], peripheral vision [PV], and momentary vision [MV],) were different among soft tennis adolescent athletes with normal vision (Group A), with refractive error and corrected with (Group B) and without eyeglasses (Group C).Setting and Design:A cross-section study was conducted. Soft tennis athletes aged 10–13 who played softball tennis for 2–5 years, and who were without any ocular diseases and without visual training for the past 3 months were recruited.Materials and Methods:DPs were measured in an absolute deviation (mm) between a moving rod and fixing rod (approaching at 25 mm/s, receding at 25 mm/s, approaching at 50 mm/s, receding at 50 mm/s) using electric DP tester. A smaller deviation represented better DP. DVA, EM, PV, and MV were measured on a scale from 1 (worse) to 10 (best) using ATHLEVISION software.Statistical Analysis:Chi-square test and Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare the data among the three study groups.Results:A total of 73 athletes (37 in Group A, 8 in Group B, 28 in Group C) were enrolled in this study. All four items of DP showed significant difference among the three study groups (P = 0.0051, 0.0004, 0.0095, 0.0021). PV displayed significant difference among the three study groups (P = 0.0044). There was no significant difference in DVA, EM, and MV among the three study groups.Conclusions:Significant better DP and PV were seen among soft tennis adolescent athletes with normal vision than those with refractive error regardless whether they had eyeglasses corrected. On the other hand, DVA, EM, and MV were similar among the three study groups.

show abstract

“…The relationship between DVA and static acuity is not entirely clear. It appears that there are large individual differences in DVA among subjects whose static visual acuitim are similar (4,25), and that any correlation between the two is increased when using lower DVA target speeds, binocular viewing conditions, longer e:.posure times, and free head movement (30,(21)(22)(23).…”

Section: Corroborated Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Further, it is agreed that DVA is critically dependent upon exposure duration (14)(15)(16)(17), that performance is enhanced by increased target mtrast (18,19), the DVA continues to improve with increasing luminance well above the levels for which static acuity has reached an asympote (6,7,20), that males score slightly better than females on DVA tests (21,22,23), and that DVA performance declines more severely with age than does static visual acutiy (21,24). The relationship between DVA and static acuity is not entirely clear.…”

Section: Corroborated Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%