2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017jg003831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between root water uptake and soil respiration: A modeling perspective

Abstract: Soil moisture affects and is affected by root water uptake and at the same time drives soil CO2 dynamics. Selecting root water uptake formulations in models is important since this affects the estimation of actual transpiration and soil CO2 efflux. This study aims to compare different models combining the Richards equation for soil water flow to equations describing heat transfer and air‐phase CO2 production and flow. A root water uptake model (RWC), accounting only for root water compensation by rescaling wat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phreatophytes are adapted to these natural fluctuations in groundwater levels by developing a certain root architecture (Gasry, ; Sprackling & Read, ). For example, a dimorphic root system as observed in this study and others (David et al, ; Prieto, Kikvidze, & Pugnaire, ) allows phreatophytes to use different sources of water (Doody et al, ; Weltzin & Tissue, ), and this type of root distribution enables root water compensation from different depth of soil depending on moisture availability (Teodosio, Pauwels, Loheide, & Daly, ; Verma, Loheide, Eamus, & Daly, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Phreatophytes are adapted to these natural fluctuations in groundwater levels by developing a certain root architecture (Gasry, ; Sprackling & Read, ). For example, a dimorphic root system as observed in this study and others (David et al, ; Prieto, Kikvidze, & Pugnaire, ) allows phreatophytes to use different sources of water (Doody et al, ; Weltzin & Tissue, ), and this type of root distribution enables root water compensation from different depth of soil depending on moisture availability (Teodosio, Pauwels, Loheide, & Daly, ; Verma, Loheide, Eamus, & Daly, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Porous-media models combine the continuity equation with the Darcy's law to define partial differential equations for the dynamics of the water potential across the SPAC. Some applications of these models focus on the water fluxes within the plant architecture (Kumagai, 2001;Bohrer et al, 2005;Chuang et al, 2006;Janott et al, 2011), others are centred on processes below-ground and the interaction between soil and roots (Somma et al, 1998;Mendel et al, 2002;Amenu and Kumar, 2007;Teodosio et al, 2017), with more recent applications looking at the whole SPAC system (Verma et al, 2014;Quijano and Kumar, 2015;Mirfenderesgi et al, 2016Mirfenderesgi et al, , 2018. Although more complex than electrical circuit models, porous-media models are able to simulate a larger variety of processes, such as root water compensation and hydraulic redistribution (Verma et al, 2014), and account for the transient response of water potential along the SPAC system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reviewed by Heinen (2014), both physicallybased mechanistic (Doussan et al 1998;De Jong van Lier et al 2008;Couvreur et al 2012) and empirical (Feddes et al 1978;Vrugt et al 2001) models have been utilized extensively to delineate root water uptake (RWU) processes. Limited by complicated or difficult to obtain parameters such as root morphology and hydraulic properties (Peters 2015;Teodosio et al 2017), the physically-based mechanistic models are not commonly used in practice. The empirical models are more readily employed because of their relative simplicity and fewer data requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%