2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between residual energy intake and the behaviour of growing pigs from three genetic lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the previously reported lower heat production associated with decreased physical activity in low RFI animals, in laying hens (Luiting et al, 1991), beef cattle (Herd et al, 2004) and pigs (De Haer et al, 1993;Barea et al, 2010;Sadler et al, 2011). Moreover, Lepron et al (2007) reported that the postures and other behaviours partly explained residual ME intake in three pig lines. The lower physical activity in the RFI − line in the present study was mainly related to its lower feeding activity, and a tendency for lower investigation of penmates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with the previously reported lower heat production associated with decreased physical activity in low RFI animals, in laying hens (Luiting et al, 1991), beef cattle (Herd et al, 2004) and pigs (De Haer et al, 1993;Barea et al, 2010;Sadler et al, 2011). Moreover, Lepron et al (2007) reported that the postures and other behaviours partly explained residual ME intake in three pig lines. The lower physical activity in the RFI − line in the present study was mainly related to its lower feeding activity, and a tendency for lower investigation of penmates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, this has been investigated to a lesser extent in pigs. Using experimental paradigms, a line selected for decreased RFI and a control line in Yorkshire gilts (Sadler et al, 2011) or three genetic lines differing for RFI (Lepron et al, 2007) have been compared for their behaviour differences: a lower physical activity was reported in lines showing low RFI. Moreover, Barea et al (2010) described a lower energy expenditure related to decreased physical activity (standing v. lying) in low RFI pigs penned individually in respiration chambers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also seemed more active and although the difference in activity was not significant, the proportion of resting pigs was significantly lower in the intact groups. They probably had less need for resting as they spent less energy on fighting, which is an energyconsuming activity (Lepron et al, 2007). Except for the newly mixed control pigs, the distribution of activities during the day observed in this study was in accordance with previous studies (Bolhuis et al, 2005;Andersson et al, 2012); young pigs spend approximately half of the day lying down and the time increases with increasing age during the growing-finishing phase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Monitoring animal locomotion in groups is an essential aspect of analysing different behaviours. Some of the more specific behavioural aspects that can be focused on are locomotor behaviour (Lepron et al, 2007), lameness detection (Kramer et al, 2009), agonistic behaviour (Szendrő and Dalle Zotte, 2011) and freezing behaviour (Vanheukelom et al, 2012). Moreover, this technology can help to monitor a large number of welfare measures taken to improve the animals' wellbeing (Botreau et al, 2007), such as "ease of movement" and "thermal comfort".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%