2010
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between radiographic techniques (kilovolt and milliampere-second) and CTDIVOL

Abstract: To investigate the relationship between radiographic techniques (i.e. kilovolt and milliampere-second) and the corresponding volume computed tomography dose index (CTDI(vol)). Data were obtained for CTDI(vol) for head and body phantoms from the ImPACT CT patient dosimetry calculator for 43 scanners from four major vendors of medical imaging equipment (i.e. GE, Philips, Siemens and Toshiba). CTDI(vol) were obtained with the largest X-ray beam width, and using a CT pitch of unity. For each scanner, relative valu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since this patient was injected with 181.3 MBq, the final dose to the fetus was of 3.6 mGy. Even when adding the dose of the transmission scan used for attenuation correction, which in this case was estimated at about 5 mGy (Elojeimy et al 2010), the fetal absorbed dose from [ 18 F]-FDG PET/CT scans remains well within the ‘‘safe’’ levels. At this stage of pregnancy, the threshold dose is 650 mGy for mental retardation and 500 mGy for small head size and growth retardation (Steenvoorde et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since this patient was injected with 181.3 MBq, the final dose to the fetus was of 3.6 mGy. Even when adding the dose of the transmission scan used for attenuation correction, which in this case was estimated at about 5 mGy (Elojeimy et al 2010), the fetal absorbed dose from [ 18 F]-FDG PET/CT scans remains well within the ‘‘safe’’ levels. At this stage of pregnancy, the threshold dose is 650 mGy for mental retardation and 500 mGy for small head size and growth retardation (Steenvoorde et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The image noise dependence on dose can be expanded by taking into account that the dose varies linearly with tube current and with exposure time. In addition, image noise dependence on tube peak voltage can be introduced since the radiation dose varies as DkVpn where kVp is the peak voltage and n is a kilovoltage dependency factor that has been estimated to have a value of approximately 2.6 (14) . The value n depends on the radiation quality of the beam, tube output, and detector response.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decrease in tube voltage will also lead to a decrease in radiation dose at the expense of a potential increase in image noise (16). While radiation dose decreases linearly with a decrease in tube current, radiation dose decreases by a power of 2.6 with tube voltage reduction (17,18), which makes this a powerful technique with which to decrease radiation exposure. X-ray tube voltage reduction has been successfully applied to CT angiography, as well as to imaging of thinner patients and pediatric patients (19,20).…”
Section: Patient Population and Bowel Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%