1996
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1996)122:2(165)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Project Interaction and Performance Indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
34
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Kubicki et al (2007) claim that the success of construction project is characterized by relations between participants. Pocock et al (1996Pocock et al ( , 1997 have the same opinion that a sufficient level of interaction between designers and constructors brings success to the overall project performance. Hence, coordination is more needed for such environment to build up teamwork and integration working environment, and it is fundamentally necessary for ensuring the success of a construction project.…”
Section: Journal Of Organizational Management Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kubicki et al (2007) claim that the success of construction project is characterized by relations between participants. Pocock et al (1996Pocock et al ( , 1997 have the same opinion that a sufficient level of interaction between designers and constructors brings success to the overall project performance. Hence, coordination is more needed for such environment to build up teamwork and integration working environment, and it is fundamentally necessary for ensuring the success of a construction project.…”
Section: Journal Of Organizational Management Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Project team integration, through more 26 interaction and collaboration early in the design process, has led to success in mitigating 27 industry fragmentation on a project-by-project basis (El Asmar et al 2013; Konchar and Sanvido 28 1998). Along these lines, Pocock et al (1996) acknowledged that projects with low degree of 29 interaction had a wide range of cost and schedule growth and number of modifications, while 30 projects with high degree of interaction tended to have better and more consistent 31 performance indicators. Konchar and Sanvido (1998) concluded that more integrated delivery 32 methods (design-build, construction manager at risk, and design-bid-build in descending order 33 of integration) provided better results in terms of cost and schedule.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that time, safety is expressed a success factor [7]. Pocock et al (1996), explained legal claims of the project as another indicator of the success of the project [8].…”
Section: Definitions Of Project Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since that time, safety is expressed a success factor [7]. Pocock et al (1996), explained legal claims of the project as another indicator of the success of the project [8]. Wuellner (1990) claimed that a project is successful when it is performed on time and on budget with a reasonable profit margin [8].…”
Section: Definitions Of Project Successmentioning
confidence: 99%