Abstract:Opiate users (n = 135) from southern England, Glasgow and Edinburgh were interviewed about opiate overdose (lifetime). Fifty-six percent had overdosed. The majority (66%) reported mixing opiates with at least one other drug (mainly alcohol and/or benzodiazepines) at their last overdose. Patients identified misjudgements of purity, mixing drugs and misjudgements of tolerance as causes of overdose. The sample was divided into groups: (1) ‘no prescription’, (2) prescribed ‘diazepam only’, (3) prescribed ‘methadon… Show more
“…Greater numbers of treatment episodes indicates greater movement in and out of treatment during the study period which may arise due to a chaotic lifestyle with increased exposure to the known risk periods, the first two weeks in treatment and first month off treatment. The increased hazard of death among those with co-prescriptions for benzodiazepines is consistent with previous research (Man, Best, Gossop, Stillwell, & Strang, 2004) and toxicological reports of drug related deaths. (Zador, et al, 2005).…”
“…Greater numbers of treatment episodes indicates greater movement in and out of treatment during the study period which may arise due to a chaotic lifestyle with increased exposure to the known risk periods, the first two weeks in treatment and first month off treatment. The increased hazard of death among those with co-prescriptions for benzodiazepines is consistent with previous research (Man, Best, Gossop, Stillwell, & Strang, 2004) and toxicological reports of drug related deaths. (Zador, et al, 2005).…”
“…12 The low perception of risk associated with the loss of tolerance and the high frequency with which this situation occurs among participants (in the last 12 months 44.1% had abstained from heroin for more than 30 consecutive days and 7.1% for 16-30 days) suggest that this factor may play an important role in the overdoses produced in the cities studied. That most users have a better knowledge of the risk of using more or purer heroin than usual than they do of the risk of loss of tolerance is consistent with the results of other studies [22][23][24]32 and may lead users to take more precautions in relation with the former factor than the latter. 22 Many young heroin users in the cities studied are also not conscious of the high risk of overdose from using heroin by the intravenous as opposed to other routes of administration (55.6% did not identify this factor), especially injectors who had not been in contact with syringe exchange or distribution programs, those who had been in prison for a long time and those who lived in Barcelona.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is not surprising, then, that as in other studies, [22][23][24]32 this factor was by far the most frequent reason for overdose recognized by the young heroin users in the cities studied. In fact, 85.1% identified it in the OEQ or PCQ referring to overdose in general.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Risk factors that have been cited less frequently are the use of very pure or a large amount of heroin, the presence of some health problems, the use of heroin together with cocaine, the use of methadone alone or together with benzodiazepines or alcohol, and attempted suicide. 4,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] A comparison of these objective risk factors with the reasons for overdose self-perceived by users, a subject addressed by few studies to date, 2,[22][23][24] could provide some guidance on the need for specific programs to prevent overdoses or for a change in our approach to these programs.…”
To identify the self-perceived reasons for unintentional opioid overdose of young heroin users in three Spanish cities and their agreement with objective risk factors for overdose. Computer-Assisted Personal Interviews (CAPI) were held with 991 streetrecruited current heroin users aged 18-30. The general reasons for overdose and the reasons for the last overdose suffered were explored with open-ended (OEQs) and precoded questions (PCQs). Limited knowledge of overdose risk factors was defined as mention of fewer than two objective risk factors for unintentional overdose in the OEQ. Univariate, bivariate, and logistic regression methods were used. 77.8% (Seville), 64.9% (Madrid) and 57.2% (Barcelona) of participants have limited knowledge of overdose risk factors. Residence in Seville and not having attended courses or meetings on overdoses were significantly associated with limited knowledge, after adjusting for other factors. The most frequently identified general reasons in OEQ or PCQ were using heroin in large amounts (66.8%), together with tranquilizers (62.0%), adulterated (60.7%), or purer than usual (57.6%). Most reasons were selected more frequently in PCQ than in OEQ, especially rapid injection of the entire dose and using heroin shortly after using tranquilizers or alcohol, by injection, or after a period of abstinence. The results were similar for overdoses suffered by participants. Most young heroin users do not have sufficient knowledge of overdose risk factors, especially the use of heroin by injection, after a period of abstinence, or together with alcohol or methadone. Specific informational or educational programs adapted to the local context are critically needed.
“…A number of studies have identified risk factors associated with fatal and nonfatal opiate overdoses, the most common of which is the concurrent use of heroin and other central nervous system depressants, such as alcohol or benzodiazepines (Mann et al, 2004;Warner et al, 2001;Sporer, 1999;Dark and Zador, 1996). Additionally, opiate overdose often results from a voluntary or involuntary lapse in heroin use, such as those associated with drug treatment (Davoli et al, 1993) and incarceration Seaman, 1998).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.