2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2009.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between polymorphism in the manganese superoxide dismutase gene and breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the results are also conflicting. Even for one risk factor, some of the studies show a significant risk modification, while others do not [6,11,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the results are also conflicting. Even for one risk factor, some of the studies show a significant risk modification, while others do not [6,11,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding has led to a number of case-control studies for illustration of its contribution to a variety of diseases [4,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. However, the results of investigation into its function in breast cancer are conflicting [6,11,13,14,21], implying that its effect may be modified by other risk factors. So far, the factors previously evaluated include menopausal status, use of oral contraceptives, use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT), vegetables and fruits intake, vitamin supplement, body mass index (BMI), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis suggested that the Ala allele of the MnSOD gene was a low-penetrance susceptible gene in prostate cancer development [9]. Several original studies have reported the role of MnSOD Val16Ala polymorphism in breast cancer risk [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], but the results are inconclusive, partially because of the possible small effect of the polymorphism on breast cancer risk and the relatively small sample size in each of published studies. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of these associations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same year, Kocabaş et al (35) also carried out another case-control study, including 103 patients and 84 controls, demonstrating a similar result to Bergman et al (32); however, no significant difference about the risk of allele T and C was observed. Furthermore, the majority of other publications suggested that the SOD2 Val-16Ala could not increase or decrease breast cancer risk and survival (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)33,34,(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%