Relationship between Oral Health Status and Bone Mineral Density in Community-Dwelling Elderly Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study

Takeda, Mayu; Matsuda, Yuichi; Ikebuchi, Kumi; Takeda, Mitsunobu; Abe, Takafumi; Tominaga, Kazumichi; Isomura, Minoru; Nabika, Toru; Kanno, Takahiro

doi:10.3390/healthcare9040432

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, higher soy protein intake in rats resulted in increased bone mineral density (BMD) under nonenergy deficiency [ 87 ]. Increased BMD may be an indicator of good oral health status in humans [ 88 , 89 ].…”

Section: Factors Affecting Optimal Dietary Intake In Older Adultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Protein Intake and Oral Health in Older Adults—A Narrative Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Oral health is vital to general health and well-being for all ages, and as with other chronic conditions, oral health problems increase with age. There is a bi-directional link between nutrition and oral health, in that nutrition affects the health of oral tissues and saliva, and the health of the mouth may affect the foods consumed. Evidence suggests that a healthy diet generally has a positive impact on oral health in older adults. Although studies examining the direct link between oral health and protein intake in older adults are limited, some have explored the relationship via malnutrition, which is also prevalent among older adults. Protein–energy malnutrition (PEM) may be associated with poor oral health, dental caries, enamel hypoplasia, and salivary gland atrophy. This narrative review presents the theoretical evidence on the impact of dietary protein and amino acid composition on oral health, and their combined impact on overall health in older adults.

show abstract

Section: Factors Affecting Optimal Dietary Intake In Older Adultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Protein Intake and Oral Health in Older Adults—A Narrative Review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Numerous studies have underscored a correlation between advanced age and the occurrence of peri-implantitis [ 29 , 30 ]. Several factors, more prevalent among older adults, contribute to this association, including challenges in maintaining optimal oral hygiene [ 31 ], diminished masticatory function [ 32 ], and a decline in bone mineral density [ 33 ]. Age emerges as a pivotal determinant in bone health, given the well-established trend of decreasing bone mass density with aging, observed in both male and female patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Prosthetic Material and Restoration Type on Peri-Implant Bone Resorption: A Retrospective Analysis in a Romanian Sample

Sabău,

Juncar,

Moca

et al. 2024

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Objectives: This research investigates the nuanced factors influencing peri-implant bone resorption in implant-supported fixed prostheses, with a focus on age, gender, implant location, time since prosthetic loading, and material characteristics. Methods: Records from a dental clinic in Oradea, Romania, between 1 January 2017 and 1 January 2023, were scrutinized and were selected by means of purposive sampling. All records were analyzed between 1 May 2023 and 15 June 2023. A total of 160 implants were included, and the prosthetic restorations were either metal-ceramic or zirconia. Implants from a single manufacturer were used, and a standardized loading protocol was followed. The study examined variables such as age, gender, implant location, prosthetic material, and time since prosthetic loading. Results: A total of 160 implants were included, with 78 applied to female patients (48.8%) and 82 to male patients (51.2%). The age range of the patients undergoing dental implant procedures was 30 to 79 years. Implants were distributed between the mandible (51.2%) and maxilla (48.8%), with 49.4% placed in the posterior dental arches and 50.6% in the anterior dental arches. The majority of patients received metal-ceramic prosthetic reconstructions (76.9%). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in resorption patterns between zirconia and metal-ceramic restorations (p < 0.001), with zirconia restorations exhibiting higher resorption in the mesial-vertical and distal-vertical planes compared to metal-ceramic restorations. Age-related factors showed a significant association with distal-vertical resorption (p = 0.017), with patients aged 60–69 years exhibiting higher resorption values compared to those aged 40–49 years. Gender differences were observed in mesial-horizontal resorption (p = 0.036), with male patients displaying higher resorption values compared to female patients. Implant location and time elapsed since implant loading did not show significant associations with resorption patterns. Conclusions: The study provides insights into the multifactorial nature of peri-implant resorption. Age, gender, and material characteristics contribute to variations, informing personalized treatment approaches. The findings facilitate a comprehensive understanding for clinicians, enhancing treatment planning and post-operative care.

show abstract

“…Щільність кісток, як правило, вища на нижній щелепі та в передній ділянці, ніж у верхній щелепі та задніх відділах [9,13]. У результаті досліджень виявили позитивну кореляцію між мінеральною щільністю кісткової тканини щелеп і кількістю зубів у зубному ряді [14,15]. Можна припустити, що залежність щільності кісткової тканини від кількості зубів і протяжності дефекту зубного ряду визначають одні й ті самі фактори.…”

Section: матеріали і методи дослідженняunclassified

“…Підвищена щільність у «великих» дефектах може бути пов'язана з більшою тривалістю стану адентії. Збільшення терміну спричиняє більшу резорбцію губчатої кістки й ущільнення кортикального шару [8,14]. На верхній щелепі анатомічні умови є перешкодою для збільшення щільності.…”

Section: матеріали і методи дослідженняunclassified

Correlation of bone density of individual jaw sections according to Hounsfield with the length of the adentiary section in the cone-beam computer tomography program

Sydor,

Strohonova,

Varzhapetian

2023

Pathologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim. To study the existence of a relationship between the density of bone tissue and the length of the edentulous part of the tooth row. Materials and methods. Evaluation of the density of the spongy substance of the jaws by the maximum and average value of HU. The density of cancellous bone was evaluated only in the areas available for implant placement. The groups consisted of the localization and extent of the dentition defect. Statistical methods included the estimation of the arithmetic mean (M), standard deviation (σ), error of the mean (m), confidence interval (95 % CI), estimation of the median (Me) and interquartile range ([Q1; Q2]), Student’s test (t criterion). Results. Maximum and average indicators of cancellous bone density in defects of the upper (562.4 [347.1; 777.8] and 301.5 [163.0; 439.9], respectively (р = 0.84) and lower (1379.0 [1116.2; 1641.9] HU and 848.6 [630.6; 1066.6] HU, respectively, p = 0.96) jaws in the areas of molars and premolars with “large” defects are significantly different from the indicators “small” defects (299.7 [176.9; 422.4] and 642.6 [470.4; 814.9], 1061.1 [866.5; 1255.7] and 608.3 [440.5; 776.1, respectively). The average bone density of the alveolar process of the upper jaw is almost the same in defects of different lengths. The average density of the cancellous bone of the alveolar part of the lower jaw in “large” defects has significant differences from “average” ones (p = 0.02) and “small” (p = 0.005) defects. Conclusions. The average density of cancellous bone of the alveolar part of the lower jaw in “large” defects has significant differences from “medium” (p = 0.02) and “small” (p = 0.005) defects, and regardless of the extent of the dentition defect corresponds to class D3 (350–850 HU) according to the Misch classification. The average density of cancellous bone of the alveolar process of the upper jaw in the areas of molars and premolars does not have significant differences depending on the extent of the dentition defect and corresponds to class D4 (150–350 HU) according to the Misch classification. Since one class includes a large range of values, the clinical classification of Misch does not allow taking into account individual bone density indicators that have statistically significant differences in different areas of the dentition.

show abstract

Relationship between Oral Health Status and Bone Mineral Density in Community-Dwelling Elderly Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study

Cited by 5 publications

References 52 publications

Protein Intake and Oral Health in Older Adults—A Narrative Review

Protein Intake and Oral Health in Older Adults—A Narrative Review

Impact of Prosthetic Material and Restoration Type on Peri-Implant Bone Resorption: A Retrospective Analysis in a Romanian Sample

Correlation of bone density of individual jaw sections according to Hounsfield with the length of the adentiary section in the cone-beam computer tomography program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About