2014
DOI: 10.1298/jjpta.vol17_018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Muscle Stiffness Measured by the Muscle Hardness Meter and Passive Torque or Myotendinous Junction Displacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these methods require expensive devices, such as an isometric dynamometer and ultrasonography; additionally, passive torque is generally used only as a parameter of limited joint movement. Nakamura 29 ) reported that significant positive correlations were observed between muscle hardness and passive torque or displacement of the myotendinous junction and suggested that muscle hardness when measured by a muscle hardness meter is both an accurate index and an easy-to-use method. In our study, a muscle hardness meter was used to assess the changes in muscle hardness while maintaining the same SLR ROM before and after the intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods require expensive devices, such as an isometric dynamometer and ultrasonography; additionally, passive torque is generally used only as a parameter of limited joint movement. Nakamura 29 ) reported that significant positive correlations were observed between muscle hardness and passive torque or displacement of the myotendinous junction and suggested that muscle hardness when measured by a muscle hardness meter is both an accurate index and an easy-to-use method. In our study, a muscle hardness meter was used to assess the changes in muscle hardness while maintaining the same SLR ROM before and after the intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%