Relationship between geomorphology and contamination with weathered hydrocarbons in an old river levee/marsh association

Abstract

ABSTRACT:A site evaluation was made for a low-lying property in an old river levee/marsh association, used marginally for cattle raising, which was contaminated due to historical practices. Contamination was related to geomorphology: the lowest areas contained 79 % of the contaminated samples. Other contaminated samples were all rear access roads (probable intentional dumping). There were no samples in the higher, levee areas away from roads with hydrocarbon concentrations above 3,000 mg/kg. Medium and high impact levels, corresponding to average hydrocarbon concentrations of 13,400 mg/kg and 109,700 mg/kg, respectively, were found in 28 % and 27 % of the property area. The medium impact level was predicted to have a reduced pasture production potential of ~ 50 % while at the high impact level practically no pasture production was predicted. Toxicological risk to cattle is present in only 12 % of the sample points although almost all of these are in very marshy areas not apt for cattle raising. Because the hydrocarbons at this tropical site are very weathered, acute toxicity was not related to hydrocarbon concentration. Although slightly more than half of the property has hydrocarbon concentrations above the permissible limit, only about one-third of the contaminated area is apt for cattle raising. This study, based on hydrocarbon distribution related to site geomorphology, soil toxicity bioassay, risk assessment to cattle and evaluation of pasture production allowed to made a more accurate assessment and definition of future use of the site. These criteria could be used for diagnostic studies of sites with similar tropical conditions.

Hydrogen peroxide interference in chemical oxygen demand during ozone based advanced oxidation of anaerobically digested livestock wastewater

“…Some organic constituents of livestock wastewater are very persistent, often remaining even after a series of biological treatments (Adams et al, 2009). Chemical oxidation process using strong oxidation agents is a good option for removing non-biodegradable organic compounds from biologically-treated effluent (Oeller and Demel, 1997;Arslan and Balcioglu, 2001;Yasar et al, 2007;Tambosi et al, 2009).…”

Comparison of biostimulation and bioaugmentation for remediation of soil contaminated with spent motor oil

“…(Dhanasekaran et al, 2009;Chukwuma et al, 2010;Refaat, 2010) Because of these alterations and potential threat to public health and the environment, some forms of remediation become imperative. Physicochemical technologies have been used for ages for the treatment or disposal of soils contaminated with petroleum products (Adams et al, 2009;Yousefi Kebria et al, 2009 (Less and Senior, 1995;Vidali, 2001). These limitations include: they are expensive to implement at full scale, they are not environmentally friendly, their technologies are complex and they lead to destruction of soil texture and characteristics.…”

Soil contact bioassay for rapid determination of acute toxicity with Eisenia foetida

“…It is unlikely that this large reduction in toxicity (100 % mortality to 3-13% mortality) is only a result of the modest additional reduction in hydrocarbon concentration (from 1.3% to 0.8%). In similar work on weathered petroleum in clayey soils, this level of reduction hydrocarbon concentration has only resulted in a corresponding reduction in toxicity of about 30% (Adams et al, 2009). It is possible that this last chemical oxidation step also finally transformed some unknown drilling fluid additive into a substantially less toxic compound, greatly reduced its concentration, or reduced its bioavailability to earthworms in contact.…”