2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44685-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between ETS Transcription Factor ETV1 and TGF-β-regulated SMAD Proteins in Prostate Cancer

Abstract: The ETS transcription factor ETV1 is frequently overexpressed in aggressive prostate cancer, which is one underlying cause of this disease. Accordingly, transgenic mice that prostate-specifically overexpress ETV1 develop prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. However, progression to the adenocarcinoma stage is stifled in these mice, suggesting that inhibitory pathways possibly preclude ETV1 from exerting its full oncogenic potential. Here we provide evidence that TGF-β/SMAD signaling represents such an inhibitor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well accepted that TGF-β1 is mediated through both TGF-βR1 and TGF-βR2 receptors to induce phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 [31][32][33][34]. Moreover, TGF-β1 can induce Smad7 expression, an inhibitory Smad family member, to negatively regulate TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway via a feedback regulation [35,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well accepted that TGF-β1 is mediated through both TGF-βR1 and TGF-βR2 receptors to induce phosphorylation of Smad2 and Smad3 [31][32][33][34]. Moreover, TGF-β1 can induce Smad7 expression, an inhibitory Smad family member, to negatively regulate TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway via a feedback regulation [35,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Δhelk1 · enr was generated by in-frame C-terminal fusion of the Drosophila engrailed repressor region (EnR; Conlon et al ., 1996) to Δhelk1 , while enr · Δxetv1 was generated by in-frame N-terminal fusion of EnR to Δxetv1 . ΔΔxetv1 is deleted further in the N-terminal region of Δxetv1 to eliminate its DNA-binding capacity (Papoutsopoulou and Janknecht, 2000), thereby serving as a negative control construct. Structural features of the Ets proteins and their dominant-negative derivatives are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential expression analysis of two conditions was performed using version 3.16.5 of the edgeR software package 66 and the P values were adjusted using the Benjamini & Hochberg method. Validation of differentially expressed genes was done with RT-PCR 67 and visualization of amplified DNA fragments through ethidium-bromide staining 68 after agarose gel electrophoresis 69 . Respective primers are listed in Supplementary Information.…”
Section: In Vitro Protein Binding Assay Fusions Of Mdfi or Mdfic Witmentioning
confidence: 99%