1995
DOI: 10.1093/heapro/10.2.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between educational status, gender and smoking in Finland, 1978–1992

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data from the 1992 survey were validated elsewhere (Vartiainen E, Seppälä T, Korhnonen HJ, et al , submitted) 25. Self reporting and biochemical markers have shown a high degree of correspondence; thus, misclassification of smoking status due to self reporting is not likely to be great.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data from the 1992 survey were validated elsewhere (Vartiainen E, Seppälä T, Korhnonen HJ, et al , submitted) 25. Self reporting and biochemical markers have shown a high degree of correspondence; thus, misclassification of smoking status due to self reporting is not likely to be great.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously reported, smoking is today more common among the less highly educated in both sexes 525 The educational discrepancy already begins to emerge at the upper stage comprehensive level (12-15 years) 26. In Finland, less highly educated women have smoked as much as more highly educated men since the late 1980s 25.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not know whether this assumption holds. Several national studies have documented a widening of inequalities in smoking behaviour during the 1980s [36][37][38][39] and a similar widening may have occurred for other risk factors. We consider it unlikely, however, that this has seriously biased our results.…”
Section: Inequalities In Cvd Mortality 1147mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in addition to preventing smoking in general, reducing socioeconomic inequalities in smoking is another key target of antismoking policies. Previous studies have shown that socioeconomic differences in smoking are large and have widened, particularly among women (Cavelaars et al, 2000;Laaksonen et al, 2002;Peto, Lopez, Boreham, Thun, & Heath, 1994;Pierce, 1989;Pierce, Fiore, Novotny, Hatziandreu, & Davis, 1989;Rahkonen, Berg, & Puska, 1995). Given that smoking cessation is often more common in higher socioeconomic groups, the overall positive trend will widen rather than narrow the socioeconomic gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%