2012
DOI: 10.1177/0974909820120605s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between Dental Arch Dimensions and Vertical Facial Morphology in Class I Subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean interpremolar, intermolar dental and interpremolar, intermolar alveolar arch width in both maxillary and mandibular arches were found to be highest in hypodivergent patients and least in hyperdivergent patients, which was not found to be statistically significant. This is in conformance with the researches done by Uysal et al (2005), 15 Khera et al (2012), 8 Ribeiro et al (2012), 19 Grippaudo et al (2013), 20 Bhutta et al (2013), 1 Shahroudi and Etezadi (2013), 21 Prasad et al (2013), 22 Bălan et al (2014), 23 Nayer et al (2015), 24 Traldi et al (2015), 25 Gupta and Makhija (2016), 26 Perez et al (2016), 27 Aditi et al (2017), 28 and Nagrajmurthy (2017). 29 However, the data from this study presented an antithetical fashion between SN-MP angle and dental arch widths, the relationship was less strong, which showed that the SN-MP angle might not be only one of the contributing factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean interpremolar, intermolar dental and interpremolar, intermolar alveolar arch width in both maxillary and mandibular arches were found to be highest in hypodivergent patients and least in hyperdivergent patients, which was not found to be statistically significant. This is in conformance with the researches done by Uysal et al (2005), 15 Khera et al (2012), 8 Ribeiro et al (2012), 19 Grippaudo et al (2013), 20 Bhutta et al (2013), 1 Shahroudi and Etezadi (2013), 21 Prasad et al (2013), 22 Bălan et al (2014), 23 Nayer et al (2015), 24 Traldi et al (2015), 25 Gupta and Makhija (2016), 26 Perez et al (2016), 27 Aditi et al (2017), 28 and Nagrajmurthy (2017). 29 However, the data from this study presented an antithetical fashion between SN-MP angle and dental arch widths, the relationship was less strong, which showed that the SN-MP angle might not be only one of the contributing factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…7 The maxillary and mandibular dental arches can be considered as kind of ribbons, adapted to altering jaw relationships to maintain normal association between the arches for esthetic and function. 8 Schudy (1964) 6 recommended use of anterior cranial base (Sella-Nasion [SN] plane) as reference line to establish the inclination of the mandibular plane (MP). A patient with a high SN-MP angle (steep MP) has a tendency of longer face, and one with a smaller SN-MP angle (flat MP) tends to have a shorter face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar study was conducted by a group of Indian scientists [22] on 90 untreated persons (45 males, 45 females in age 17-24 years) whom were measured the Jarabak ratio and performed different dental measurements. As a result, the relationship between cephalometric and dental arches was identified with manifestation of sexual dimorphism as in the previous study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It was found that individuals with a short facial type had thicker bones than individuals with a long facial type [15,16]. Furthermore, individuals with long faces had narrower arch dimensions, whereas those with short faces had wider arches [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%