1975
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800620105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between changes in plasma gastrin and lower oesophageal sphincter pressure after meals

Abstract: Changes in plasma gastrin and lower oesophageal sphincter pressure were measured in 20 subjects after a standard protein meal. Significant increases in both gastrin and sphincter pressure were seen. Peak gastrin response occurred an average of 19-5 minutes and peak lower oesophageal sphincter response 40-0 minutes after the meal. Both gastrin and sphincter pressure showed a wide spectrum of response. In 5 subjects there was no appreciable rise (less than 5 pg/ml) in plasma gastrin after the meal, and 3 of thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
2
1

Year Published

1976
1976
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, changes 102 secondary effects on gastrin release, and gastrin concentrations were measured during cimetidine infusion in the present studies. The role of gastrin as a physiological determinant of LOS pressure is now in debate, and the recent studies of Dent and Hansky (1976) and our own unpublished data, have failed to confirm earlier suggestions that gastrin is involved in LOS control (Giles et al, 1969;Castell and Harris, 1970;McCall et al, 1975). In any event, mean serum gastrin concentrations did not show any statistically significant variation from basal values (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Nevertheless, changes 102 secondary effects on gastrin release, and gastrin concentrations were measured during cimetidine infusion in the present studies. The role of gastrin as a physiological determinant of LOS pressure is now in debate, and the recent studies of Dent and Hansky (1976) and our own unpublished data, have failed to confirm earlier suggestions that gastrin is involved in LOS control (Giles et al, 1969;Castell and Harris, 1970;McCall et al, 1975). In any event, mean serum gastrin concentrations did not show any statistically significant variation from basal values (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It also suggests that the rise in LESP after the protein solution could be independent of its protein content and due to some factor common to the two solutions. McCall et al (1975) used a similar though lower molarity protein solution, but did not use a control. Their conclusion that the pressure rise they obtained, which was very similar to this study, was mediated by gastrin is invalid, since it relies on the assumption that gastrin release was the only way in which the solution could affect LESP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, many of the studies reporting a rise in LOS pressure after protein feeding (Nebel and Castell, 1972;Lipshutz et al, 1973;Roszkowski et al, 1973) have assumed rather than demonstrated an effect on circulating gastrin levels. In studies which have included serum gastrin determinations there has been a varied temporal relationship between administration of the stimulus to gastrin release, the peak gastrin response, and the change in LOS pressure (Higgs et al, 1974;McCall et al, 1975;Dent and Hansky, 1976). Furthermore, while Dent and Hansky (1976) report a rise in LOS pressure 30 minutes after the peak gastrin response to protein instillation, a similar rise was observed after intragastric instillation of a control solution of saline, this time without accompanying variation in the serum gastrin concentrations.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no doubt that exogenous gastrin increases sphincter pressure (Giles et al, 1969;Cohen and Lipshutz, 1971;Trindade et al, 1975;Kaye et al, 1976) but the evidence that endogenous gastrin is a physiological determinant of sphincter pressure is less convincing (Grossman, 1973;Roszkowski et al, 1973;Farrell et al, 1974;McCall et al, 1975;Dodds et al, 1975a, b;Dent and Hansky, 1976). Central to the controversy is the methodology of LOS pressure measurement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%