2006
DOI: 10.14214/sf.340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between biomass and percentage cover in understorey vegetation of boreal coniferous forests

Abstract: In the present study, the aboveground biomass of the understorey vegetation of boreal coniferous forests was modelled according to the percentage cover. A total of 224 observations from 22 stands in upland forests and 195 observations from 14 different studies in peatland forests were utilized for the present analyses. The relationships between biomass and percentage cover can be used in ecosystem and carbon-cycle modelling as a rapid nondestructive method for estimation of the aboveground biomass of lichens, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
59
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
59
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…66 (2009) 307 hand, biomass of herbaceous species and mosses were often estimated using regressions with ecological cover notations (Alaback, 1986;Andariese and Covington, 1986;Muukkonen et al, 2006;Yarie and Mead, 1988). We combined both approaches using vegetation cover notations and species-specific heights; our aim at testing such a method was to establish accurate biomass models that also presented the convenient advantage of permitting quicker field sampling than individual biomass measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…66 (2009) 307 hand, biomass of herbaceous species and mosses were often estimated using regressions with ecological cover notations (Alaback, 1986;Andariese and Covington, 1986;Muukkonen et al, 2006;Yarie and Mead, 1988). We combined both approaches using vegetation cover notations and species-specific heights; our aim at testing such a method was to establish accurate biomass models that also presented the convenient advantage of permitting quicker field sampling than individual biomass measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understorey biomass was linked to stand characteristics such as canopy cover (Ford and Newbould, 1977;Muukkonen et al, 2006;Pieper, 1990;Pyke and Zamora, 1982). In maritime Pine stands, cover didn't vary along a large range of values impeding such a clear relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this approach cannot be used in protected areas and is not repeatable on the same plot, making such methods unfeasible for biomonitoring and permanent plot studies. Non-destructive estimation methods that use relationships between biomass and vegetation cover have been devised for several vegetation types (Siccama et al 1970;Röttgermann et al 2000;Muukkonen et al 2006), but do not regard nutrient pools. Thus, intensive monitoring programs such as the European Level-II-network (Schulze et al 2000;De Vries et al 2003;Seidling 2005) have so far considered understorey vegetation only in terms of its indicator quality and contribution to forest biodiversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree biomass is the main component of the carbon stock of vegetation, but the understory vegetation especially litter may play an important role (Muukkonen et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%