1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.52.r471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations between isoscalar charge form factors of two- and three-nucleon systems

Abstract: Theoretical predictions for the deuteron and the isoscalar trinucleon charge form factors are compared. Correlations between them are found. Linear relations hold for the position of the diffraction minimum and for the position and height of the secondary maximum. The linear relation for the diffraction minimum misses the experimental data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Its magnitude (.0038 ± .0003) is clearly inconsistent with the corresponding one of the three-nucleon isoscalar charge form factor, still within the same model calculations [36]. The t 21 results of Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its magnitude (.0038 ± .0003) is clearly inconsistent with the corresponding one of the three-nucleon isoscalar charge form factor, still within the same model calculations [36]. The t 21 results of Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…[21,26]. Assuming as we do here implicitly that these two data sets have the same weight, the location of this node is not quite consistent with a relation between the two-and three-nucleon isoscalar charge form factors, established with various N − N potentials [36]. The secondary maximum of |G C | is very flat, so that its location (5.3 ± .5…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Cross section measurements yield the structure functions A͑G C , G Q , G M ͒ and B͑G M ͒, which combined with T 20 ͑G C , G Q , G M ͒ allow the determination of these form factors [1]. The present data set for elastic e-2 H scattering and the isoscalar charge form factor of the three-body system pose an interesting puzzle [14] for the few-body theory: there exists no theoretical model capable of describing all measurements simultaneously. T 20 has only a limited data set, and accurate measurements of this observable are required to address this issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…to draw attention to the work in [124] where relations between isoscalar charge form factors of two-and three-nucleon systems were studied and inconsistencies were found using the "standard" model of meson exchange currents. is in quite good agreement with the data up to about 4 fm −1 , while the two-body current dependent isovector magnetic form factor is dramatically off the data in the higher Q-range as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison With Datamentioning
confidence: 99%