2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relations between impulsive personality traits, alcohol and cannabis co-use, and negative alcohol consequences: A test of cognitive and behavioral mediators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
28
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
7
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, substance-specific expectancies served as the strongest predictor of heavier/more frequent use, with AE-SAM high arousal positive expectances incrementally predicting simultaneous use frequency, AEAS high arousal positive expectancies incrementally predicting heavier drinking, and AECS positive expectancies incrementally predicting more frequent cannabis use. Thus, although research has suggested that alcohol and cannabis couse is related to positive alcohol expectancies (e.g., Waddell, Blake, & Chassin, 2021), the present study suggests that college student simultaneous use is in fact related even more strongly (and incrementally) to positive AE-SAM expectancies, particularly high arousal positive expectancies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, substance-specific expectancies served as the strongest predictor of heavier/more frequent use, with AE-SAM high arousal positive expectances incrementally predicting simultaneous use frequency, AEAS high arousal positive expectancies incrementally predicting heavier drinking, and AECS positive expectancies incrementally predicting more frequent cannabis use. Thus, although research has suggested that alcohol and cannabis couse is related to positive alcohol expectancies (e.g., Waddell, Blake, & Chassin, 2021), the present study suggests that college student simultaneous use is in fact related even more strongly (and incrementally) to positive AE-SAM expectancies, particularly high arousal positive expectancies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Children and adolescents typically have stronger negative expectancies, but expectancies become more positive with age and experience (Wiers et al, 1998). Positive alcohol expectancies consistently predict earlier initiation of drinking in adolescence (Bekman et al, 2011;Smit et al, 2018), heavier drinking across the life span (Colder et al, 1997;Cooper et al, 1995;Pabst et al, 2014;Waddell, Blake, & Chassin, 2021;Waddell, Sternberg, et al, 2021), and negative alcohol consequences/AUD symptoms (Brown et al, 1985;Corbin et al, 2015;Turrisi et al, 2000;Waddell, Sternberg, et al, 2021). In contrast, negative alcohol expectancies are inconsistently related to drinking, though they are typically related to more negative consequences (Engels et al, 2005;McMahon et al, 1994;Pabst et al, 2014).…”
Section: Outcome Expectancies and Substance Use Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support, several studies find that impulsivity indirectly predicts alcohol use and/or negative alcohol consequences through positive expectancies (e.g., Anderson et al, 2003; Corbin et al, 2011; McCarthy et al, 2001). In addition, studies have tested separate effects of impulsivity facets, finding that sensation seeking (e.g., Corbin et al, 2011), lack of premeditation (e.g., Banks & Zapolski, 2017; Waddell, Blake, et al, 2021), and positive urgency (e.g., Peterson et al, 2018; Settles et al, 2010, 2014) all are associated with heavier/problem drinking indirectly through positive expectancies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavy drinking (4+ drinks for women, 5+ for men) is a serious public health problem, as it has myriad negative consequences, including risk of Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD; NIAAA, 2018;Perkins, 2002;Waddell, 2021;Waddell et al, 2021;Wechsler et al, 2004). In response to growing rates of heavy drinking (Grant et al, 2017), several studies have found that motivational and skill-based interventions reduce heavy drinking, particularly in young adults (Marlatt et al, 1998;Turrisi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%