2022
DOI: 10.1037/pas0001147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The anticipated effects of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use: Initial development and preliminary validation.

Abstract: Social learning theories suggest that outcome expectancies are strong determinants of behavior, and studies find that alcohol and cannabis expectancies are associated with negative substance use outcomes. However, there are no measures to date that assess expectancies for simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use (SAM), often referred to as SAM, despite strong links with negative consequences and rising time trends. The present study sought to provide initial validation of test scores for the Anticipated Effects o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants (N = 443) were college students who simultaneously used alcohol and cannabis recruited from a large southwestern university as part of a study on alcohol and cannabis expectancies (Waddell, King, et al, 2022). The parent study recruited a mix of participants who used alcohol-only and who simultaneously used alcohol and cannabis, totaling N = 657 participants, of whom 496 reported simultaneous use.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants (N = 443) were college students who simultaneously used alcohol and cannabis recruited from a large southwestern university as part of a study on alcohol and cannabis expectancies (Waddell, King, et al, 2022). The parent study recruited a mix of participants who used alcohol-only and who simultaneously used alcohol and cannabis, totaling N = 657 participants, of whom 496 reported simultaneous use.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study to our knowledge has queried participants about subjective effects of simultaneous use. This study focused on anticipated effects (Waddell, King, et al, 2022), and exclusively used items from validated alcohol and cannabis expectancy measures. Thus, outside of validated single-substance measures and researcher-selected items (e.g., "drunk," "intoxicated," "euphoria"), little is known about how participants describe the subjective experience of simultaneous use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this article focuses on measures of SAM use‐related consequences and cognitions, we would be remiss to not briefly discuss assessment of SAM use itself. SAM use frequency among college students has been assessed by asking participants about their alcohol and cannabis co‐use, such as, “How often do you use cannabis and alcohol at the same time – that is, so that their effects overlap?” (e.g., Waddell et al., 2022, p. 814), “Do you use marijuana when you are using alcohol?” (Cummings et al., 2019, p. 353), or “indicate … how often you used alcohol and marijuana simultaneously (i.e., during the same session)” (e.g., Bravo et al., 2021, p. 4). These are slightly different interpretations of SAM use (i.e., effects overlapping vs same session), which may lead to differences in results across studies, especially when looking at between‐person effects (i.e., the effects across individuals [e.g., people who tend to engage in more frequent SAM use vs. not] rather than effects one person may have day to day [e.g., on a day someone engages in SAM use vs. not]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An average score was calculated. More recently, the Anticipated Effects of Simultaneous Alcohol and Cannabis Use Scale (AE-SAM; Waddell et al, 2022) was developed. The AE-SAM is a 5-factor, 26-item measure developed by combining and reducing the Anticipated Effects of Alcohol Scale (Morean et al, 2012) and the Anticipated Effects of Cannabis Scale (Waddell et al, 2020).…”
Section: Assessment Of Sam Use Cognitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation