Relational Cartography: Research Subject

Chabaniuk, V.

doi:10.15407/ugz2016.04.059

Cited by 3 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For confirmation, we recommend a modern understanding of the Atlas Base Map (ABM) [3]. There, the concept of the ABM General system significantly used, and with it the structuralist general systems theory.…”

Section: Fig 1 the Relations Of The Inquiring Systems In A Fixed Peri...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The levels are called: 1intervention, 2object, 3meta. The concept of van Gigch level essentially coincides with the concept of strata, which is used in our similar constructions [3]. Therefore, instead of the term 'level', the term 'strata' is used when appropriate.…”

Section: Fig 3 Hierarchy Of Inquiring Systems That Create An Arbitrar...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The DRDSI platform is mentioned in the monograph [3]. At the time of its writing, there were still Internet references on the European Location Framework (ELF) project, the result of which was supposed to be the practical implementation of INSPIRE.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition to horizontal harmonizations, there are harmonizations that should be called vertical. Thus, using the example of Atlas information systems (AtIS) in the monograph [3], we explained the essence of the "vertical" epistemological/reductional relations that exist between the components of the corresponding strata. In the hypothetical three-dimensional cube of relations of Relational Cartography, they were shown on the Y axis, which was understood in the same way as in the usual three-dimensional space of Euclid.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Harmonization strategy of the spatial information infrastructure of Ukraine with INSPIRE. system approach

Chabaniuk,

Dyshlyk

2024

ZKMZ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Van Gigch's system approach was applied to consider the option of systemic harmonization of the National Spatial Information Infrastructure of Ukraine (NSII) with INSPIRE. The article focuses on its most important part - the strategy of harmonization or, more specifically, strategic harmonization. The proposed strategic harmonization is suitable for practical implementation. For this purpose, NSII is understood as an extension of National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI), and NSII and INSPIRE are represented by general systems (GS), whose practical feasibility is achieved by exemplification/interpretation by spatial information systems (SpIS) and certain their extensions - SpISb. The main attention is paid to the relation between the NSII and INSPIRE, with an emphasis on the harmonization relation. Possible alternatives to the problems or their solutions are not considered. In particular, the likely recent shift of interest from NSDI/NSII/INSPIRE to IGIF (Integrated Geospatial Information Framework) is not considered. This is possible because van Gigch's system approach used allows scaling, in this case - upwards, with the addition of higher levels of the hierarchy such as IGIF to the consideration. It is shown that, in the context of harmonization with INSPIRE, it is necessary to examine the harmonization of GS on at least three epistemological levels. GS corresponding to these levels can be called: strategic, tactical and operational. The GS for harmonization with INSPIRE can be represented by an integrated hierarchy or a unification of three GS components of these three levels. In the case of unification, each component of the collective agreement can be considered separately, but the context of harmonization must be mandatory. In particular, in strategic harmonization, it is mandatory to define its hierarchical relations with the "corresponding" tactical harmonization. Two main results were obtained in the article: 1) scientific - the structure of the phenomenon "harmonization of Ukrainian SII with INSPIRE" was defined, 2) practical - it was proved that the specified phenomenon is adequately represented by the GS and the corresponding SpISb.

show abstract

Section: Fig 1 the Relations Of The Inquiring Systems In A Fixed Peri...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Fig 3 Hierarchy Of Inquiring Systems That Create An Arbitrar...mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Harmonization strategy of the spatial information infrastructure of Ukraine with INSPIRE. system approach

Chabaniuk,

Dyshlyk

2024

ZKMZ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There, after reviewing the evolution of models, the required module of the NSDI of Ukraine was named product-process and indicated in its detailed description using 5 static and 4 dynamic principles of creation. Static principles S1-S5 are considered in detail in the article [Chabaniuk, Dyshlyk, 2017], dynamic principle D3 -in the article .…”

Section: General Description Of Pilotsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lessons of DRDSI pilot projects in Ukraine

CHABANIUK¹,

DYSHLYK²,

TARNOPOLSKIY³

2022

MAGSI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The work considers practical examples of processes realization of product-process model of the National (N) Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI, together -NSDI) of Ukraine , which meet two of the four dynamic principles of the latter building [Chabaniuk, 2018]. They were obtained in 2016 as part of pilot projects (pilots) of the regional European project to create the so-called Danube Reference Data and Services Infrastructure [DRDSI, Dusart, et al., 2016]. Pilots were implemented for the territory of 3 districts of Odessa region of Ukraine adjacent to Moldova. Despite the 6 years that have passed since then, these results not only remain, but become even more actual. The growing actuality is explained by several reasons, among which the most important are three: 1) [Law of Ukraine "About NGDI", 2020] noncompliance with the recommendations (requirements) of INSPIRE; 2) inconsistency of the SDI (Spatial Data Infrustructure) model enshrined in the said Law with the Ukrainian reality; 3) the needs of practice.The results of the work are useful for determining [Law of Ukraine "About NGDI", 2020] changes, the model of which must be changed to "correct" and "feasible" . Due to the use of open technologies in pilots, the latter can be used in practical projects without the cost of purchasing commercial software.

show abstract

CIDOC CRM as the basis of the Electronic State Register of Immovable Cultural Heritage of Ukraine

Chabaniuk,

Dyshlyk,

Pioro

2023

ZKMZ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The article is the final in a series of articles on Conceptual Provisions for the Creation of a New Electronic State Register of Immovable Cultural Heritage (CH) of Ukraine. These provisions correspond to the components of the Solutions Framework (SoFr) of special Spatial Information Systems (SpIS) defined in the monograph [15]. The special SpIS of the new registry of the CH of Ukraine should belong to the class of Atlas Geoinformation Systems (AGIS), which is described in [14]. The first queue of AGIS – AGIS-CH1 – is proposed as the first queue of the new electronic State Register of Immovable CH of Ukraine. The first queue should include, at least, three components that are simultaneously SoFr packages: Products-Processes-Basics. The conceptual provisions of AGIS-CH1 describe these three most important components of the architectural pattern of AGIS-CH1: AGIS-CH1.Products, Part 1 [17]; AGIS-CH1.Processes, Part 2 [18], AGIS-CH1.Basics, Part 3, consisting of two subparts, 3.1 and 3.2. Subpart 3.1 is described in the article [19]. This article describes subpart 3.2, which is called "Basics. CIDOC CRM". It consists of two main sections. The first of these initially examines the prerequisites that lead to the use of CIDOC CRM. Such prerequisites are two evolutions: system and subject. System evolution claims that the time has come to consider the registry of the CH of Ukraine as a SpIS of the Web 3.0 Formation, also known as the Semantic Web, especially if we have in mind the creation of a new registry. Subject evolution refers to the evolution of understanding of the domain of cultural heritage. From the review of this issue in the monograph [4], it is obvious that modern CH registers should be "process" rather than "product". In order to proceed to the consideration of CIDOC CRM with a better understanding of the essence of the issue, the CHARM model (Cultural Heritage Abstract Reference Model) was considered. CIDOC CRM can also be considered as such, but CHARM is described in an excellent monograph [4] that is practically applicable, unlike the scattered articles on CIDOC CRM. The second of the two main sections of the article deals with CIDOC CRM and its use. We do not describe CIDOC CRM completely. Attention is paid only to its "spatial" and "process" parts. In addition, attention is paid to the use of CIDOC CRM. For this, the information from the website (https://www.cidoc-crm.org/how-i-can-use-cidoc-crm, 2023-jun-26) is used first. Then there is some initial information about the Arches software platform. We offer the Arches platform for the implementation of AGIS-CH1.

show abstract

Relational Cartography: Research Subject

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Harmonization strategy of the spatial information infrastructure of Ukraine with INSPIRE. system approach

Harmonization strategy of the spatial information infrastructure of Ukraine with INSPIRE. system approach

Lessons of DRDSI pilot projects in Ukraine

CIDOC CRM as the basis of the Electronic State Register of Immovable Cultural Heritage of Ukraine

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About