Relation entre le niveau de connaissance et le taux de vaccination contre le virus de la grippe parmi le personnel du CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Dutheil, Frédéric; Kelly, Carol; Biat, I.; Provost, D.; Baud., Olivier; Laurichesse, H.; Chamoux, A.

doi:10.1016/j.medmal.2008.09.017

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most cross-sectional studies included in our meta-analyses described a bias of self-report such as skipping questions and incomplete information, nondisclosure, and uncertainty regarding timing of questionnaire. Percentage of respondents within those studies may seem low, from 45% [74] to 76% [77], however the response rate was higher than usual [142,143,144,145,146]. The language used in countries with two official languages may also have influenced responses [74].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suicide among physicians and health-care workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dutheil

Aubert

Pereira³

et al. 2019

PLoS ONE

316

267

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Medical-related professions are at high suicide risk. However, data are contradictory and comparisons were not made between gender, occupation and specialties, epochs of times. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on suicide risk among healthcare workers. Method The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct and Embase databases were searched without language restriction on April 2019, with the following keywords: suicide* AND (« health care worker* » OR physician* OR nurse*). When possible, we stratified results by gender, countries, time, and specialties. Estimates were pooled using random-effect metaanalysis. Differences by study-level characteristics were estimated using stratified metaanalysis and meta-regression. Suicides, suicidal attempts, and suicidal ideation were retrieved from national or local specific registers or case records. In addition, suicide attempts and suicidal ideation were also retrieved from questionnaires (paper or internet).

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Suicide among physicians and health-care workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dutheil

Aubert

Pereira³

et al. 2019

PLoS ONE

316

267

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This study has some limitations. The response rate may seem low compared with other studies [ 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 ], but we included a convenience sample size of workers to demonstrate the association between the work addiction risk, job demands, and mental health-related indicators. Our sample was representative in terms of age and gender of the WittyFit users, however, companies did not give further details on the demographic profile of workers, and the selection of the WittyFit users was a convenience, non-representative sample of the French workers.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Link between Work Addiction Risk and Health-Related Outcomes Using Job-Demand-Control Model

Dutheil

Charkhabi

Ravoux

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of the study: Work addiction risk is a growing public health concern with potential deleterious health-related outcomes. Perception of work (job demands and job control) may play a major role in provoking the risk of work addiction in employees. We aimed to explore the link between work addiction risk and health-related outcomes using the framework of job-demand-control model. Methods: Data were collected from 187 out of 1580 (11.8%) French workers who agreed to participate in a cross-sectional study using the WittyFit software online platform. The self-administered questionnaires were the Job Content Questionnaire by Karasek, the Work Addiction Risk Test, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and socio-demographics. Data Analysis: Statistical analyses were performed using the Stata software (version 13). Results: There were five times more workers with a high risk of work addiction among those with strong job demands than in those with low job demands (29.8% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.002). Addiction to work was not linked to job control (p = 0.77), nor with social support (p = 0.22). We demonstrated a high risk of work addiction in 2.6% of low-strain workers, in 15.0% of passive workers, in 28.9% of active workers, and in 33.3% of high-strain workers (p = 0.010). There were twice as many workers with a HAD-Depression score ≥11 compared with workers at low risk (41.5% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.009). Sleep quality was lower in workers with a high risk of work addiction compared with workers with a low risk of work addiction (44.0 ± 27.3 vs. 64.4 ± 26.8, p < 0.001). Workers with a high risk of work addiction exhibited greater stress at work (68.4 ± 23.2 vs. 47.5 ± 25.1) and lower well-being (69.7 ± 18.3 vs. 49.3 ± 23.0) compared with workers at low risk (p < 0.001). Conclusions: High job demands are strongly associated with the risk of work addiction. Work addiction risk is associated with greater depression and poor quality of sleep. Preventive strategies should benefit from identifying more vulnerable workers to work addiction risk.

show abstract

“…The response rate may seem low compared with other studies also using a questionnaire in the French population [66][67][68][69][70][71]. However, we included a substantial sample size of workers, allowing to carry out the statistical analyses with the number of subjects required, determined a priori.…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Work Addiction Test Questionnaire to Assess Workaholism: Validation of French Version

Ravoux¹,

Pereira²,

Brousse³

et al. 2017

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Work addiction is a significant public health problem with a growing prevalence. The Work Addiction Risk Test (WART) is the gold standard questionnaire to detect workaholism. Objective: The main objective of this study was to validate the French version of the WART. Methods: Questionnaires were proposed to voluntary French workers using the WittyFit software. There were no exclusion criteria. The questionnaire was administered anonymously for initial validity testing and readministered one week later for test-retest reliability. We also assessed the workers' sociodemographic characteristics, as well as other measurements for external validity, such as stress, well-being, and coaddictions to tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis. Several psychometric properties of the French-WART were explored: acceptability, reliability (internal consistency [Cronbach alpha coefficient] and reproducibility [Lin concordance coefficient]), construct validity (correlation coefficients and principal component analysis), and external validity (correlation coefficients). Results: Among the 1580 workers using WittyFit, 187 (11.83%) agreed to complete the WART questionnaire. Of those, 128 completed the test-retest survey (68.4%). Acceptability found that all respondents had fully completed the questionnaire, with few floor or ceiling effects. Reliability was very good with a Cronbach alpha coefficient at .90 (internal consistency) and Lin concordance coefficient at .90 (95% CI .87-.94] with a difference on the retest of .04 (SD 4.9) (95% CI −9.6 to 9.7) (reproducibility). We identified three main dimensions (construct validity). Relationships between WART and stress and well-being confirmed its external validity.

show abstract

Relation entre le niveau de connaissance et le taux de vaccination contre le virus de la grippe parmi le personnel du CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Cited by 10 publications

References 20 publications

Suicide among physicians and health-care workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Suicide among physicians and health-care workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Exploring the Link between Work Addiction Risk and Health-Related Outcomes Using Job-Demand-Control Model

Work Addiction Test Questionnaire to Assess Workaholism: Validation of French Version

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About