SAE Technical Paper Series 2013
DOI: 10.4271/2013-01-1599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relation between Tip Penetration and Droplet Size of Diesel Spray

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the differences in many test parameters (tables 1 and 5), the SMDs of LFO/diesel sprays reported by Hwang et al (2017) are similar to the SMDs of the present study. Kawaharada et al (2015) and Komada et al (2013) have also studied droplet diameters in diesel sprays, and the large range in their reported arithmetic mean diameters covers the results of this study. On the other hand, Cárdenas et al (2010) have found much smaller diameters, presumably due to substantially higher ambient temperatures.…”
Section: Droplet Sizessupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spite of the differences in many test parameters (tables 1 and 5), the SMDs of LFO/diesel sprays reported by Hwang et al (2017) are similar to the SMDs of the present study. Kawaharada et al (2015) and Komada et al (2013) have also studied droplet diameters in diesel sprays, and the large range in their reported arithmetic mean diameters covers the results of this study. On the other hand, Cárdenas et al (2010) have found much smaller diameters, presumably due to substantially higher ambient temperatures.…”
Section: Droplet Sizessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Nevertheless, the error due to motion blur was lower for the determination of opening angles as the transversal velocities of sprays are much lower. It is also noted that while Kawaharada et al (2015) and Komada et al (2013) have measured even higher velocities than the 200 m/s close to the nozzle, spray tip velocities decrease rapidly when increasing the distance from the injector. Using a characteristic length of 20 mm, the errors of 0.7 mm and 0.3 mm correspond to relative errors of 3.5% and 1.5%, respectively.…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They also found that the small-sized droplets show a very broad axial and radial velocity range, while the large-sized droplets show a relatively narrow velocity range similar to the mean velocity of the whole of the pre-swirl spray. Komada et al [14] used a laser 2-focus (L2F) velocimetry technique to measure the velocity and size of droplets at the injection pressure of 800 bar in diesel sprays. They observed that droplets at the center have a higher velocity and the velocity decreases from the center towards the spray periphery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of the velocity and size of droplets was successfully conducted by the developed L2F at 0.5 mm downstream from nozzle orifice (Ueki, et al, 2004). The temporal changes of the spray tip penetration near the nozzle orifice observed by macroscopic images were related to the size of droplets inside sprays measured by the L2F (Komada, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%